Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

270

WordPress.org bans WP Engine, blocks it from accessing its resources (techcrunch.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The blocked resources in question? Automatic security and features updates and plugin/theme repository access. Matt Mullenweg reasserted his claim that this was a trademark issue. In tandem, WordPress.org updated its Trademark Policy page to forbid WP Engine specifically (way after the Cease & Desist): from "you are free to use ['WP'] n any way you see fit" to a diatribe:

The abbreviation “WP” is not covered by the WordPress trademarks, but please don’t use it in a way that confuses people. For example, many people think WP Engine is “WordPress Engine” and officially associated with WordPress, which it’s not. They have never once even donated to the WordPress Foundation, despite making billions of revenue on top of WordPress.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/26/wordpress-vs-wp-engine-drama-explained attempts to provide a full chronology so far.

Edit:

The WordPress Foundation, which owns the trademark, has also filed to trademark “Managed WordPress” and “Hosted WordPress.” Developers and providers are worried that if these trademarks are granted, they could be used against them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's still the compelling-ish point of them only contributing 40 hours to the project per week, though.

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The GPL doesn't say you have to contribute anything other than the changes you make. If automattic is not happy with the terms of the GPL they should have picked something else. But then the product wouldn't be so popular.

Honestly, I don't see the difference from buying managed service for a software from a random cloud provider. You can go anywhere and get a fully managed postgresql, kubernetes and so many others, most of them probably dont contribute much.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying it's legal, I'm saying it's part of being "nice". Matt claims Automattic also gave WP Engine the option to pay the license in contributing development hours.