this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
248 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

PV = Photovoltaic

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 60 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Why not just make solar roofs over things like parking lots and sidewalks? That way it can provide cover and power, you can use off the shelf panels, and they are unlikely to get damaged.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you can repair them without needing to shut down a whole railway. All these projects to put solar panels in novel places are totally pointless and solving a problem that doesn't exist.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 month ago

Yeah until we literally run out of roofs, fields, parking lots, and fucking ocean space and are contemplating a fucking Dyson sphere I really don't understand these projects.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In France, solar panels are mandatory for roofs of commercial and industrial buildings and also car parks occupying 500 m² or more of ground surface need to be covered by solar.

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

parking lots would require the government to own said parking lots. its why you often see them at schools (because its government funded)

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I doubt they're doing this and only this.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 1 points 1 month ago

wouldn't make much sense to put up a solar roof after doing this. it would block the sun.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Covering parking lots is expensive and you lose spots to supports and there's the inevitable car hitting those supports.

Putting panels between rail lines doesn't need a structure so it should be far cheaper and easier to install and fix, even if they aren't ideal.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They will get dirty very fast, either from dirt thrown around by passing trains, or by the brake dust.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Also the heavy vibration that can occur when a train passes over

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago

What brake dust? Where they're contemplating putting this the trains are fully electrified and use regenerative (magnetic) braking during routine operations, the only time the abrasive brakes are engaged is during emergencies

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It shouldn't be too hard to clean them with something running on the tracks, but it does seem less than ideal.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

A chain or wire hanging off a train car and dragging along will "clean" them real quick...

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

NIMBYs and their freedoms* to do whatever they want.

*not applied to not wanting "golf grass", wanting a different color of paint on the house, etc.