this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
844 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gigasser@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't think Lemmy users hate Firefox. I feel like alot of it is either people who legitimately have whatever needs they have, fulfilled by chrome more than firefox, or....it's fucking astroturfers/fanboys.

Edit Addendum: Also, if anything, Lemmy users fucking love Firefox.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't mean all Lemmy users. I mean a surprisingly large amount that non-stop hate on Mozilla and Firefox.

I've even seen two users that hate Mozilla/Firefox so much that they wrote about it in their account bio, which I find crazy.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mozilla have made a series of unpopular choices, especially their enabling of telemetry for advertisers that does nothing to benefit users.

It is no surprise some people are vocally unhappy.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Private ads that make user tracking impossible absolutely benefits users, and the ad industry would be a lot less of a cancerous cesspit if it were the norm.

It's certainly been unpopular, but that's more because most people on Lemmy don't read past ragebait headlines and assume the worst.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s just another source of telemetry for advertisers and won’t stop any of the existing methods of tracking.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's a private alternative.

I never said Mozilla was supreme dictator of the web and could force everyone to follow suit.

"Bad things still exist so Mozilla shouldn't develop good things" is not a rational take.

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem is that it isn’t an alternative, it is an additional and it does not benefit users in any way.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It is an alternative, and if it became more common in the industry it would be one of the best things to happen for user privacy in decades.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is no reason to trust Mozilla more with your data than anybody else.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lmao

Putting aside for a moment how obviously untrue that is, Mozilla doesn't even get the data. Not at any point to they have your data for this.

You're just showing how clueless you are. You don't even know how the system works.

It's tiring talking about this online, because all the people that are pissed off about it clearly haven't read past the damn headlines. Educate yourself on how the system works, then form your opinion about it.