Technology

59495 readers

3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

594

Adobe Cuts Perpetual License for Elements from Lifetime down to just three years (petapixel.com)

submitted 1 month ago by LuuTuyen@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

113 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Among the most significant changes with this year’s Elements releases has little to do with new features but instead concerns the ways users purchase and own the software. While prior versions of Photoshop and Premiere Elements have been lifetime licenses — the user buys the software and then owns it indefinitely — this year’s release has moved to a three-year license term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FJW@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There has to be a meaningful number of companies where each individually is spending more on adobe licenses than it would cost them to pay a bunch of developers to get gimp to the point where it is a fully sufficient alternative. But hey, the only thing more important to capitalists than making profit seems to be, to not go for cheaper FLOSS options, rather than spending pointlessly large amounts of money on proprietary software…

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

A lot of FOSS projects have succeeded in approximately this way. I think it can only be a matter of time until this happens even in this area.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is still the perception that it's too cheap to be good in many cases. I've run into this fairly recently. It's stupid, but it exists, and sometimes it exists in the people making the decisions.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Feels like there's a very simple solution to that. "We can't use free software, you get what you pay for. We're not switching to GIMP." "Okay, what about Rasteditor? It costs $99/year." "Sounds good, get a license for everyone on the team." And Rasteditor is just a fork of GIMP with a different logo and the subscription model just donates to the GIMP project.