this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
301 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OK poof there are now 100 name servers delegating .com. Which one does your ISP default you to? [1-100]

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All of them, find one that responds an answer valid for my local saved key.

The DNS server is no longer an authority on its own, just your keyring matters.

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The certificate authorities on my ring that I trust. For normal people that's already included in their OS or browser

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, an authority? It sounds like this would complicate DNSSEC by requiring the "root keys" to be stored outside the DNS itself.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We already have to have key rings. Centralized DNS is just a second, superfluous layer of authority (and a massive grift) on top

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

"Centralized DNS" is an oxymoron, we'll have to agree to disagree