this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
276 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2972 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah cuz that works sp much better than offering incentives to lower emissions.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They are functionally the same.

That said, a tax or fine would be easier to implement.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fines and taxes are incentives. Companies will do whatever's cheapest, so you can make the good thing cheaper, or the bad thing more expensive. Both will have a similar effect, it's just a question of where the margins are.
If a company is selling something at-cost and gets taxed, then they'll have to raise prices for the consumer, but if they're getting a stimulus from the government it gets covered by tax payers. Which one ends up being the right choice depends on the product and company in question.