this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
529 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3081 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
529
Winamp deletes entire GitHub source code repo after a rocky few weeks (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 145 points 1 month ago (5 children)

WACUP

https://getwacup.com/

Replacing native Winamp code with modern code with frequent updates by one of the most prolific classic Winamp developers.

It's fantastic.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

But does it whip the llamas ass?

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Naturally

[–] rain_worl@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

wacup! it really whips the ladspa's ass!

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What a shame that it isn't open source.

I'll happily continue to use Audacious with a Winamp skin.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, given the very unorthodox nature of it as it is today, I don't know that Dr0 can legally open source it until he's finished replacing literally all legacy functions with new code, even if they wanted to. But I can understand your position.

[–] skaffi@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whether that's the case or not, I think it is secondary to the fact that he clearly says on the website that he definitely doesn't want it to go open source, for as long as he is working on it.

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

He defines that as wanting to be in control of the project so long as he has the passion to work on it solo. But it's somewhat implied that if he had to let it go, he may open source his work. I can understand that. DrO was one of the primary and most prolific Winamp plugin devs back in it's heyday as well. So if you ever used Winamp itself (closed source) you have already trusted his code on much more vulnerable OSes, imo.

I feel like he's earned the limited trust this requires.

[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

And you can set the visuals to unlimited fps, which is fun on a good screen

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's so interesting!

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Geiss support tho?