this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
406 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3114 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
406
Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it's a "packaging bug" and that "Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model." (www.phoronix.net)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is an update to a post that was previously shared in the community: Concerns Raised Over Bitwarden Moving Further Away From Open-Source

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I thought bitwarden was open source?

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 4 points 1 month ago

Was yes. They have introduced an "internal sdk" into all their clients with no available source code. That's what everyone's complaining about. They call it a "packaging bug", but in reality Bitwarden clients are just no longer open source.