this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
573 points (83.7% liked)

Memes

45727 readers
1087 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

There's only like 16,777,216 basic kinds of person.

Like 8^8 variations.

I mean we're all unique, but not really. There's like 500 of you on earth right now.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

My odds of having sex with myself just went up.

[–] Moghul@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Those poor bastards. MY doppelgangers and I should meet and exchange notes on how to deal with all the weird shit we live with.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago

The version of me on North Sentinel Island is living his best life away from all the crazies and fucking up anyone who tries to disturb his peace.

... I'm jealous.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Humans are just flesh computers, but LLMs are just guessing what a human would say, not coming up with something new. AI art is the same way.

Once AI can think for itself, legitimately, I think AI art can be considered art, and that's a long way away.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah, in particular, Generative AI does not yet perceive reality for itself. It does not yet live a life. It does not go through hardships. It doesn't have stories to tell that it itself experienced.

It's able to regurgitate and remix stories that were meaningful at some point, and superficially one might not even be able to tell the difference, but if you want to hear a genuinely meaningful story, there's no way yet around sourcing it from a human.

Generative AI is able to create pretty/entertaining artworks, but no expressive art.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›