"Own"
It's all rental levels these days.
this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
47 points (92.7% liked)
Games
16806 readers
867 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So if I have this right:
- a license from the PlayStation Plus Collection is not eligible (which requires an active PlayStation Plus Essential (or better) subscription)
- a license from the PlayStation Plus Catalog is eligible (which requires an active PlayStation Plus Extra (or better) subscription).
If we put aside the predictable confusion caused by the subtle name schemes I have to wonder if they really think holding back the upgrade from PS+ Essential subscribers is really going to incentivize sales.
From Sony's perspective these are long term customers who have held a PS+ sub for a while and have chosen not to bump up their subscription, this is unlikely to change their mind.
From Bethesda's perspective offering the PS5 version at all is PR move, offering it for free to paid purchases is a PR move, offering it to PS+ Catalog subscribers is a PR move. Why stop there, alienating PS+ Collection owners feels like a strange place to draw the line.
I doubt it is Bethesda holding it back. This sounds like a Sony enforcing their rules thing. They wrote the wording on how the levels of rentalship work on their platform, I doubt they will let a company from a competing platform try to break those rules to give more players free stuff.
The Sony rules turned me off of PlayStation.
Generally these decisions are made by the publishers. That just so happens to be Sony sometimes.
No, lots of PlayStation games have allowed for a free update to the ps5 version.
Sony's licensing has been odd, though but I have no doubt that its easily doable and moneynisnthe issue.
I am a long term PS+ subscriber. This constant deprecation and nickel and diming is going to make my next purchase a steam deck. I only subscribe for online play, the games are a bonus. They are usually not my tyoe. Or often are just bad.
As console gaming and PC gaming converge, crappy console walled garden stuff just moves players awaybfrom consoles. They marker ps4 or ps5 games as separate products, but in reality, they are the same product with different graphics libraries (among other differences). With a PC, with fragmentation, I get to choose those assets as my hardware changes. On a console, they lock in with less choice and then try and charge again when I upgrade my hardware? Why would I choose the poorer, more expensive product?
A handheld gaming PC would work for me. I'm going for the highest frame rate with the most detail. Plus, it's portable!
Huh. This is their newest discord announcement, just two hours after that IGN article has been updated
Thanks for letting us know that some PS Plus subscribers have been unable to access the free next gen update of Fallout 4 on PlayStation. This issue has now been successfully resolved. Subscribers who have previously received Fallout 4 from the PlayStation Plus Collection should now be able to access the update as intended.
I still see it with a price. Some users have reported that it's fixed??
Edit: there's a new menu to add the PS5 version to your library, currently only visible on the console. The PS app and web store don't have it