this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
134 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3223 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mydude@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The wet dream of the 1% is coming true; Their own personal army with no moral compass.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 0 points 5 months ago

On the bright side, it's Chinese hard/software, so an ED-209 outcome is very probable, and highly anticipated.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago (2 children)

it does not look like a derivative at all

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Both strongly resemble Boston Dynamics's "Spot" robo-canine.

I'm betting that's exactly what they are, with some glued-on plastic detailing.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 2 points 5 months ago

How dare you! China doesn't copy, it just takes others' ideas and improve them! sometimes.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I feel like these will be useless in all but limited circumstances. A modern battlefield in urban centers will be rife with small and large rubble, making these things unreliable in real world practice when you factor its ability to balance navigating obstacles and dealing with recoil. How does it reload? How long does its battery last? What happens when its weapon jams? Additionally, tricking current AI is fairly simple when you have the resources of a modern military.

Anyway, it's interesting to experiment with, but I just don't think the technology is quite there yet. I think it'd probably be more effective to create self-destructing bomber robot dogs than gun toting ones with our current tech.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I'm less concerned about how these are deployed against soldiers as I am about how they're being provided to police departments as they are in the US.

[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is exactly my concern. These little bullet dogs patrolling the street with someone able to take control of the trigger and blame it on a malfunction

[–] variants@possumpat.io 8 points 5 months ago

Reminds me of the move code 8 part 2

[–] Shurimal@kbin.social 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Child holding a teddybear.
ED-209: "Put down your weapon! You have 40 seconds to comply!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFvqDaFpXeM

Oh, who am I kidding, human cops do exactly the same shit...

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=gcb06Gx9VMA

“Tell him, ironically, he has 10 seconds to grow a pair.”

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 5 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=ZFvqDaFpXeM

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Ding ding ding. Rubble-covered battlefields aren’t the end-goal here. The end goal is urban warfare, precision strikes, and area denial by police. Cops can post these on patrol outside of a billionaire’s house. Charging isn’t an issue, because you can simply have them automatically return to base for charging, and patrol in automatically rotating shifts.

Or have them near protests, and “accidentally” start killing people. When people get upset, cops will go “oops it was a malfunction. Too bad you can’t blame us for that. Because of, ya know, the malfunction. It totally malfunctioned. 100% wasn’t programmed to kill on sight, to break up the protest quickly. Nope, definitely a malfunction.”

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

You can't stop a mob with live fire. Patrolling though, yeah.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

There's a use case for a crawling camera. They're pretty good at going over rubble if they aren't trying to shoot at the same time. For self destructing drones flying ones are easier and cheaper to manufacture.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Horizon is a WARNING, not a SUGGESTION!

[–] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Pre-emptive Zero Dawn, do it now!

[–] CaptKoala@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

China seems to disagree.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Lets see it clear a jam tho.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Well I hope their urban training is still that bad if we ever have to fight them. And the robot dogs seem like a good idea until one of them gets introduced to OPFORs size 12 boot.