this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
99 points (98.1% liked)

Games

16785 readers
847 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

it's also a great win for AMD, in general, to provide the hardware behind the two biggest consoles on the market for two consecutive (and a third upcoming) console generations.

Doesn't the Switch have as much market share as the other two combined?

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How can the switch be a different console from last gen, current gen, and next gen? Those are literally the only generations it could be considered part of.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

but the switch is last gen?

[–] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Setting aside that the industry professionals definitely count it as current gen for sales metrics, that's fuckin, irrelevant when the statement is about all three of last gen, current gen, and next gen. Whichever one you want to call the Switch part of, it's the best selling console of that generation, so the statement that AMD sold chips the best selling console of that generation is false. Unless you want to make the claim the Switch is from 2006, they are incorrect.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 4 months ago

oh okay, i see what you meant now. but:

  • switch sold 125 million by march 2023
  • ps4 and xbox one sold 117 + 58 million by september 2023
  • wii u, which had amd gpu, also sold 13.5 million by its discontinuation

amd did win, it seems

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m nitpicking, I know, but to be infamous is a bad thing. It’s more likely the author meant prestigious or esteemed.

[–] cheeseburger@lemmy.ca 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The cell processor is infamous for making the PS3 notoriously difficult to develop for.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It was ahead of its time and required parallel processing before most developers or game engines had experience supporting it. Multicore processors didn’t become mainstream for another ~5 years.

[–] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Multi-core CPUs were still starting out to be fair, but they were definitely at least somewhat mainstream by the time of the 360/ps3. The 360 was tri-core, and was considered easier to develop for since all three of those cores shared resources. Meanwhile, the cell architecture is hard to develop for even by modern standards. As such, most games only made use of the PPE and left the SPE alone.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

The problem was less parallel processing but that every one of the cell‘s 8 co-processors (SPE) needed to be individually programmed. The 360 had a tri core design that was much easier to develop for and take full advantage of. Thus, most 360 games, especially early in the generation, look and/or perform better than their ps3 counterparts, since the latter usually only ran on the one regular processor core (PPE) that the cell had, without taking Ananas off the SPEs. Notable exceptions are the ps3 exclusive titles and some other later games, that took partial or even fully advantage. Even Naughty Dog only used 3-4 SPEs in their earlier uncharted games, while their later games like the last of us uses them all.