Technology

59756 readers

2800 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

738

LAPD warns residents after spike in burglaries using Wi-Fi jammers that disable security cameras, smart doorbells (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 4 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

213 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Los Angeles Police Department has warned residents to be wary of thieves using technology to break into homes undetected. High-tech burglars have apparently knocked out their victims' wireless cameras and alarms in the Los Angeles Wilshire-area neighborhoods before getting away with swag bags full of valuables. An LAPD social media post highlights the Wi-Fi jammer-supported burglaries and provides a helpful checklist of precautions residents can take.

Criminals can easily find the hardware for Wi-Fi jamming online. It can also be cheap, with prices starting from $40. However, jammers are illegal to use in the U.S.

We have previously reported on Wi-Fi jammer-assisted burglaries in Edina, Minnesota. Criminals deployed Wi-Fi jammer(s) to ensure homeowners weren't alerted of intrusions and that incriminating video evidence wasn't available to investigators.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Easiest way to avoid this bullshit is to install wired cameras, and such a way that they are not easy to access/cut.

I know someones gonna come in and be all "BUHBUHBUT YOU CAN JUST DESTROY THE CAMERAS" and yeah, thats true.

but you cant destroy the camera from 3 blocks over, you have to get right up on them, and your face/vehicle/other helpful information may just well be caught and recorded before you do. Unlike wifi jamming, which could be done from streets away.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 4 months ago

Me being cheap pays off; wifi cameras are expensive as fuck so I just have wired ones that don't do anything on the Internet.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Physical locks, physical keys. We are collectively becoming too "smart" for our own good

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Physical locks and keys are also easy to bypass.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 5 points 4 months ago (9 children)

I’m curious if these are actual jammers or just deauth devices.

It also seems really risky because I think we have three different bands Wi-Fi devices use now?

load more comments (9 replies)

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

FCC is gunna start blasting

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

That's why wireless security devices are a joke. And it is not only WiFi, this is BlueTooth and other protocols like that, too.

Good security (and common sense, too) would be to have such devices wired up. And check the spectrum for jammers and raise an alarm about that, too.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments