this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024

220 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59495 readers

3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

220

Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe says too many carmakers are copying Tesla (www.theverge.com)

submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 106 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This is modestly interesting. My brother worked here before they had layoffs about two years ago, and had a generally favorable opinion of the company and leadership.

Fundamentally, while I think RJ seems like a sound businessman and technologist, and I like the company's taste a bit, I will never be able to reconcile his views with mine. He very openly views cars as computers and software and services that happen to move you around, and I would like it to be a machine over which I have as minimal a relationship as possible with the manufacturer after I acquire the product.

Still, I wish them luck.

[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 69 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah no my relationship with my vehicles manufacturer should pretty much be "PART BAD SEND NEW ONE."

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Sadly that era of the vehicle industry is gone. Even if we completely forget electric vehicles, getting parts for any car is becoming harder, because the manufacturer is trying to sell you assembled bundles of things, rather than individual items.

But then we have electric cars. Swapping the battery in these is insanely costly, and if you need other repairs, brands like Tesla would purposefully go out of their way to ensure you only replace things at Tesla certified shops

[–] lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Funnily enough, the Rivian CEO talks about exactly that in this interview

In that scenario, we would be using one ECU to do everything I just described. In this case, it’s a much larger computer, but one computer. It’s a massive simplification for how we think about software development and also drives a lot of cost out of the vehicle because instead of 70 to 80 little boxes — little computer boxes with wiring and connectors and everything else — we have, in our case, seven.

So when one small thing stops working, you now have to buy their proprietary, expensive ECU instead of a cheap little microcontroller.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I have an 01' Volvo. It has an alarm siren under the bumper. They put a nicad battery in the siren so that even if the main battery is cut the alarm can go off. This battery is prone to going bad, leaking out, and ruining the control board. This will cause the sunroof to not work. The rest of the car is still fine. You will get an error message about the security system, but the car will start. You just can't use the sunroof.

If you catch the problem in time, you can cut the siren open and replace the battery, there is also some way to eliminate the alarm feature through reprogramming I think. I have also seen an aftermarket board that will take it's place.

I just live without the sunroof as it's not worth fixing.

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

And if your nav system crashes, so does your car

[–] Ifeelya@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

I suppose I'm shilling here, but check out rockauto.com for car parts. They carry an insane number of car parts for basically wholesale prices. A lot of times you can still buy the individual parts instead of entire assemblies.

[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's why God made the BBSHD.

[–] bladerunnerspider@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The what?

[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Its a popular mid-drive ebike motor conversion kit made by Bafang.

1000021579

[–] Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you make sure to not charge the battery to 100% all the time, the battery of an EV will easily last for 300,000 km. There will be a slight reduction of overall capacity, but nothing that will impact your day to day life (unless it consists of driving 24/7). Overall, EVs are way more robust than ICE cars.

But yeah, if you're out of luck, then repairs are expensive because of the reasons you mentioned.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Ugg ..no they are not. Stop this. They're good for certain things, like smaller commutes and cheaper cost per mile, but they are not more robust, not by a long shot, 300k miles not km is normal for an ICE car and then some. I've got multiple cars with 300+k on the clock and I'd drive them across the nation tomorrow.

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago (6 children)

The average lifespan of a car is 200k miles, not 300k. While it's not uncommon to see cars going higher than that, it's rare to see them get to 300k. I've had 2 Toyotas that died between 230k and 260k. There are more citations in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_longevity

Given that 300k km is ~186k miles, I think OP made a pretty reasonable comparison.

As for robustness, how do you even define that? Repair costs per year/mile? Frequency of repairs needed? In either case, there's a much bigger gap between a Jeep and a Toyota than between ICE and BEV.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The ADAC (German Automobile Club) has deemed EVs more reliable than ICE cars. I'm fairly ambivalent in this regard. EVs are still way too expensive for me. Next car will be a used ICE vehicle. Maybe after that one we'll go for an EV, simply because it makes sense for us (PV on the roof), but vehicle2home or vehicle2grid has to be the standard by then.

Older, mechanical cars are very reliable, I'll give you that. I imagine the cars you have aren't exactly the newest models.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

So while that’s true in some circumstances, you need to realize that you’re an outlier. I happen to share your view on cars - if you take care of them, they’ll take care of you… but the vast majority of the country (and the world, to a somewhat lesser degree) seems to have come around to the “my car is just an appliance” mindset. Yes, it’s tragically wasteful, but that’s what people think nowadays.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, people want inexpensive EVs. Especially with all we now know about how much of our data all manufacturers are selling. Even if the Chinese companies are blocked from selling here, someone will eventually make affordable EVs. Hope companies like Rivian are ready...

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Rivian is also firmly planted in the luxury segment, with prices to match their clientele. We need manufacturer(s) to make EVs for us common folk in a price range we can actually afford.

[–] Carrick1973@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Any new automobile manufacturer has to do that initially in order to make enough money to get the manufacturing and supply chain developed enough to create a car for the masses. They start with a lower volume and higher priced car to get the excitement for the product. Once they have that, they are able to start assembling a larger volume at a lower price.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That's a take I haven't seen before, but I have to agree with it. I was looking forward to my next vehicle being an EV, hoping that would simplify the multitude of problems that I've been having with ICE cars (most notably, transmissions).

What are the options now, when both gas and electric cars are more computer than automobile?

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ev conversion. You just get a new motor and batteries, everything else stays the same

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I know that this exists, but does anyone have an estimate on the real price? How much a conversion kit costs + how much installation costs - how much you can get from the engine and parts that are removed? With the current cost of even used cars being fairly high, how worth it/reasonable is this really?

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

I've done stupid engine swaps. Unless your vehicle has a kit, no chance you get it done for under 20k. The amount of planning to get shit to fit must be hundreds of hours. If you want to figure out the engineering you'll get in under 15k probably. I doubt it'll ever be cost efficient to convert most models.

[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 months ago

How much money you're getting from your parts I guess depends on the car you have.

The costs for the conversion kit also depend on the car and how much performance you want from it. There some companies selling the basic stuff (battery, BMS, inverter, motor) but the you must figure out how to put it, fabricate parts etc. So I'd say it's a rich people hobby...

There used to be a french start-up that was building a standard conversion kit for the most sold cars, but it disappeared :(

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

Haha a bike.

I hold out hope, actually, that as the right-to-repair movement continues to grow, eventually repairability and control will become more common consumer interests, in the same way that vehicle safety wasn't something people thought about when buying a car before the 70s, and now it's one of the main influences when buying a car.

Once people start caring -- and again, I believe this is the direction we're heading -- it will become something manufacturers have to design for.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Saw a post on YT yesterday by a guy who had put 150k on his rivian truck doing real truck shit - towing, hauling stuff. Two years in and he still loves it. It comes with a great warranty.

[–] tills13@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

JerryrigEverything?

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Whew. I'm glad he's happy with his purchase. I can't ever imagine having enough money that I could drop that kind of cash on a toy, no matter how neat I think it looks.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've never looked up the price. Someone should say what they cost for those curious enough to wonder but lazy enough to not look it up. I offer them one vote of approval redeemable nowhere.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 months ago

They start at $70k. And they are actually still losing money on each sale.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why would it be considered a toy? Actually asking

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 months ago

It's largely marketed as a recreation/sport vehicle. It's for going camping and off-roading.

That isn't too say that it can't also get you to and from work, or even be used for constructive uses. But at the price and feature set, I think anyone would agree it's designed to be a fun luxury first and foremost rather than a practical tool.

[–] O_i@lemmy.world 99 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I’m seriously thought that was Stevo

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Steve-O if no one introduced him to drugs and alcohol, and all that ambition and gusto went into starting a business, not getting tazed in the ball sack.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 22 points 4 months ago

Can you imagine, that would've been such a waste of his potential...

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

Thank you, Jesus

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

So 2024 Steve-O?

[–] lounges@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

I came here to see if anyone else did.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

They do look a like

[–] BigLgame@lemy.lol 17 points 4 months ago

Meanwhile they copied Tesla by having proprietary charging stations that only work for their vehicles.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago

As a Tesla owner, I agree, so wanna be a good example and make a cheap, simple, full of buttons EV with no tracking?

I like my car, but it would only benefit me if there were as diverse as options as possible.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

i doubt this is true; most non tesla cars actually look good where is tesla looks like a dumpster fire... and don't get me started on how garbage tesla interiors are.

[–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Unfortunately, it's pretty true at least internally, though their dumpster fire reputation is changing that. I've worked at a number of Tier 1 automotive suppliers and OEMs, and I can't even tell you the number of times I've had to listen to "We should do 'thing' because that's what Tesla does". It's leading to a lot of shitty and anti-consumer practices, but fortunately I think some of the smarter leadership is finally seeing that they were shitty ideas all along, and was nothing more that techbro bullahit.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

TL;DR Customers want bigger SUVs so manufacturers should stop building crossovers/sedans similar to the Model Y.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago

I guess they could build something similar to the Cybertruck.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

In the biggest news of all, Rivian and Volkswagen announced a $5 billion joint venture that will co-develop core parts of the hardware and software platform to be used in cars from both automakers.

We love that because it aligns so beautifully with our mission: the ability to help accelerate putting highly compelling electric vehicles into the market, which will ultimately drive more demand.

A core objective of how we’ve structured the joint venture is that we don’t lose the velocity and the speed and the decisiveness and lack of bureaucracy that exists within our software function today.

Beyond just simplification of how we manage running over-the-air updates across so many different instances, it also gets us a lot of supply chain leverage in a way that we, Rivian, haven’t had in the past.

In fact, you can imagine the day of the announcement, I had a handful of phone calls from CEOs of big semiconductor suppliers, and they’re like, “Hey, we can work harder on pricing.” So, that was awesome.

So, taking away all those mechanical design studio packaging constraints that we had before, and then solving the biggest challenge, which was network architecture by this being that as a project, it’s just a very different type of relationship.

The original article contains 11,459 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 98%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments