this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
565 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 156 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These last few months, each picture of Elon looks like another transition snapshot of Smeagol turning into Gollum.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 57 points 1 month ago

It's a common tactic of news outlets to choose bad pictures of people they're against and good pictures of people they're for. Once you see it, it cannot be unseen.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 117 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I thought he was a free speech absolutist?

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 98 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Free speech" just means "I want to spout garbage without pushback (like fact checking) or consequences."

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Just like undecided voter in the US means in the closet right wing.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

He is absolutely for his free speech.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Only for nazis

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

No, no. Bullshit absolutist.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Nope. Just a piece of absolute shit. The nastiest shit always floats to the top and gloms together.

[–] Stiffneckedppl@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Recent JD Vance interview went something like this:

Lulu Garcia-Navarro: "Senator, yes or no: Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?"

JD Vance: "Let me ask you a question. Is it OK that big technology companies censored the Hunter Biden laptop story, which independent analysts have said cost Trump millions of votes?"

Lulu Garcia-Navarro: "Senator Vance, I’m going to ask you again, did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?"

JD Vance: "Did big technology companies censor a story that independent studies have suggested cost Trump millions of votes? I think that’s the question."

🤔

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 48 points 1 month ago

This always cracks me up. He's mad about big tech censoring political information, but wants HIS political information censored. Probably not even bright enough to realize how pathetic he sounds.

[–] monke@lemmy.cafe 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's unbelievable how nearly half of America wants this guy to be their next VP.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They should have just ended the interview there, aired that bit and then said "since Vance refuses to answer questions honestly and keeps using weasel words and counter questions there is no honest conversation to be had. JD Vance ducks couches and puts his cast iron skillet in the dishwasher.... He is a monster.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago

That was an excruciating interview to listen to. He started off kinda sounding sane, but as time went on, more of his fringe ideas started showing, culminating to that point.

[–] turtletracks@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If Hunter is so bad, wait til he hears about Trump's children

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 49 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Freeze peach

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

Oh wow, the trump campaign doing shit it accused the Democrats of doing?!?!?!

I'm 10000% unsurprised.

[–] rsuri@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So basically the wildest conspiracy theories about Twitter pre-Elon are true now, but in reverse

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Every accusation is a confession

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Immigrant interfering with American elections

[–] sepi@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

elon just gives off such a horrible ick

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've been job hunting for 3 months. Hardly any recruiters are reaching out, and my applications go nowhere. A recruiter from xAI reached out the other day, and I couldn't bring myself to even apply. I told them I wasn't interested without specifying why, but it's Elon.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That recruiter might work somewhere less shit in the future, so I'd rather not burn a bridge unnecessarily.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just be honest with the recruiter that the particular employer is the issue, but you would be open to discussing other opportunities. That doesn't burn bridges, and it helps them better determine what you're looking for.

[–] lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Exactly. And if he nods his head silently, you understood each other. If he starts asking "but why, Elon is great!", burn the bridge.

You don't wanna stumble upon him in the future when he's gonna be recruiting for another Elon. 😉

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

"Muh free speech, muh Twitter Files, muh government censorship Hunter Biden laptop."

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why don't we just let Twitter/X die? It's not like it's an essential platform, there are other places to post short-form bullshit opinions. Twitter/X is not the sole supplier of any resources except their own brand name. Just walk away and let it burn. Without massive public engagement, it's just a more expensive to run Truth Social.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I remember when people called him a beacon of free speech.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago

He is a bacon of freeze peach

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You misheard, they said "beacon of Fire Speech". They burn books in that gathering of failed, divorced, didn't even peak in high school but still peaked in high school chuds.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Every accusation is a confession

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

FEC is FECkless.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I mean i guess this is related to technology??

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

File under "abusive uses of technology"