this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3183 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's nice, maybe they can finally re-enable about:config in the damn thing too. They removed it from mobile Firefox years ago and the lack of it aggravates the hell out of me.

[–] SneakyThunder@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's available in nightly (and I think dev) builds

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If you don't want to use the potentially unstable Nightly, Dev or Beta, you can use Fennec (stable builds with dev features).

[–] ugjka@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One more reason to stick with Firefox

[–] synceDD@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

[–] lennster@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] synceDD@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

[–] qfjp@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's desktop extensions. Most mobile browsers only support a subset of all available extensions (including Firefox!). Now, Firefox will support its whole library of extensions.

[–] synceDD@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They only mention "open extension ecosystem" idk if that means everything and also I haven't found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

[–] qfjp@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They only mention "open extension ecosystem"

  • The title: "Prepare your Firefox desktop extension for the upcoming Android release"
  • End of the first paragraph: "Here’s everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO…"
  • End of the second paragraph: "so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?"

also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

And those were installed from the mozilla addon library? With full support for a mobile interface? And you tried every extension available?

I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games

Flash used to be a mobile extension...

[–] synceDD@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says "about upcoming android release" desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

[–] Beaupedia@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you're a little confused about what's being said here.

[–] synceDD@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

[–] randint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Firefox has always had been the most attractive to many people.

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Mobile FF is already awesome with UBlock Origin and YT background playback extensions. I wish to install an auto redirect extension. (Twitter to Nitter) I know it is doable on beta w/ extensions etc. but I want to see them on normal Firefox.

[–] Lord_Boffum@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have a look at YouTube ReVanced if you want a much better YouTube experience on Android. :)

[–] sir_reginald@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

use Newpipe, it's free software, unlike revanced.

[–] RedIce25@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Cool! So many useful extensions that I couldn't use on android.

[–] Siliconic@discuss.online 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

About time. I'm tempted to switch back to Mull from Bromite, but I'm worried about the security of Firefox compared to Chromium (that's why I switched in the first place), I've heard that particularly Mobile Firefox has awful sandboxing and bad security, I'm pretty sure it was the GrapheneOS team saying this? I'm no security expert though...

[–] randint@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes it was the GrapheneOS team who said that. See the paragraph just above Camera. I literally just skimmed their guides and saw this yesterday while considering getting a Pixel.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I use Mull and Vanadium on Graphene OS, and the experience on Vanadium is just okay by comparison. It is true that not having extensions does decrease the attack surface, and Vanadium does have a built in ad blocker, but it simply isn't as all encompassing as ublock's list.

I use Mull mainly but don't log into anything with it, and have noscript extension on by default.

I also turn off JS by default in Vanadium. Both browsers have ways of making exceptions for certain sites in this case, but NoScript has more granular control.

I remember reading on reddit a convo that basically the GrapheneOS team was much more concerned with security than privacy. This isn't to say they don't care about privacy at all, just that they will always prioritize security first.

This makes sense considering their decision to only officially support the Pixel line of devices. You still are supporting Google by giving them your money (and a bit of your data in the process of purchase). Additionally, the decision to default to using the Google Play Store and sandbox the apps, rather than use the Aurora Store, also points to these underlying values.

[–] JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Posted this above, but it might interest you as an alternative to Vanadium:

Bromite hasn't been updated in a while, so you should at least switch to Cromite if you're not switching to Mull. It's a fork by a previous Bromite contributor and includes some improvements, like a bottom toolbar and adblock plus (so normal block lists, not Bromite's less customizable ad blocker.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is Vanadium just Bromite under the hood? I thought they were separate projects...

[–] JuvenoiaAgent@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're different, but according to its readme, Cromite includes "security enhancement patches from GrapheneOS project", so I assume it contains Vanadium's changes as well as other improvements.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the clarification! I'll investigate.

[–] xantiv@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any reason to switch from Fennec?

[–] thecam@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wont Feddec support mobile extensions in the future?

[–] thecam@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Now Brave needs to do the same and also create its own extension store