this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
-31 points (34.7% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simple@lemm.ee 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Okay man, we get it. You like Bluesky. You've posted at least 10 articles of people moving from X to Bluesky.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Articles about this will continue to be posted until moral improves

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 3 days ago

Strong shill op for blue sky is underway no doubt, i can't tell if it is organic since they are getting large user inflows or jay graber is funding these endless fake news headlines.

we will never know... but we do know that corpos love them shill ops to gain market share.

right wing accounts are learning that they're nothing without constant rage bait interactions.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

just say X-odus

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Moreover, Bluesky already feels a bit like how social media would look if a non-TERF version of the Guardian was running it. It’s very liberal, very centrist, and very ‘don’t rock the boat too much’.

We’ll be keeping an eye on this, and for the moment we’ll be posting to both Twitter and Bluesky. We look forward to engaging with you wherever you end up.

"we're not ready to choose between the cop bar and the Nazi bar, so for now we'll keep hanging out in both."

Of course they don't mention fediverse as an option. Of course.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I thought they were the same bar

[–] Juice260@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Why do so many people think they MUST be heard? 😆 That’s one of the reasons I deleted Reddit. Too many weirdos thinking that I owed them a debate or something whenever I commented something they disagreed with. It happened on Twitter too but I got rid of that when musk announced that he was going through with the purchase.

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

I DISAGREE with you. YOU ARE NOW OBLIGATED TO ENTER AN EPIC DEBATE TO THE DEATH WITH ME BECAUSE REACHING A CONSENSUS IS IMPOSSIBLE IN THE INTERET!!!!!!!!

(((((((((((((((((/s (in case it wasn't obvious))))))))))))))))))

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ideally everyone would be able to set up rules as to who and what they see.

Something like (pseudo syntax initially like SQL, but went off track):

IF sum(this.poster.posts.karma) < -100 OR this.score < -10 OR sum(this.poster.opinions.rating WHERE this.poster.opinions.source IN me.friends) < 0 THEN false ELSE true END.

[–] QuillanFae@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you're proposing that front end devs literally provide an optional field for those with the time and motivation to curate their feed programmatically with some kind of query language, that's god damn brilliant, and would persuade me to use an otherwise feature–lacking but decently polished client over any other.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes.

I'd also want a standard, so that it wouldn't be monopolized into one bigger platform, like with GMail.

And probably servers should have some kind of zero-knowledge protection, so that such a client-side filter would be the only one applied to the information. Maybe with ability to subscribe to filters published by someone else, of course, or kill lists, but always preserving transparency and choice.

EDIT:

I think NOSTR is kinda similar, only it has public keys as identities, just so. In general its cryptographic mechanisms are used as intended, but in a very ancient way. It's too simplistic.

New Freenet (Locutus), I think, is going to be a platform where one can make such an application and a thousand others.

because so much of conservative thought is about having captive audiences; look at how much they try to whine when they get protested at a school campus.

[–] psychothumbs@lemmy.world -2 points 3 days ago

The reason people post on these sites is to make themselves heard I guess. You just have to ignore or block your way into the level of interaction you're comfortable with.

we've become this tech illiterate to not understand the possibility of mastodon being a option.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago

Holy cow, what a Bluesky shill account.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -1 points 2 days ago

Does this belong in technology?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

do terfs support maternity leave?

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 days ago

Probably for themselves only.