I don't understand the desire to make humanoid robots. If a human shape is more efficient because of the workflow or physical restrictions, why not just rearrange the production line and use regular robot arms?
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
It's so that our replacements can work alongside us just long enough for us to trust them. It'll make us less resistant when they drag us to the bio-repurposing vats.
mmm unexplained vats mmmm
The main use of humanoid robots is to work in environments suitable for humans (think inspecting a dam or such, climbing ladders and everything), as well as flexibility, especially when it comes to low-frequency tasks. BMW makes a lot of different models with tons of different options, their production line isn't really a line it's a directed graph.
Humans made things for humans.
Rearranging everything is better but more expensive. Sometimes it absolutely will be and has been done. There will be cases where humanoid robot is cheaper and easier. That's not even bringing up new uses like waiter or carer, but those will be much later generations.
I think it's to provide a general solution for most labor shortages and not specific solutions.
there are no labor shortages, just wage shortages
I agree with that, but the current shape of the population will result in a true labor shortage eventually. We just need to start thinking about how to deal with that future today. UBI will eventually be required when companies can manufacture labor and people will legitimately not be able to work.
Or to prevent laborers in becoming uppity and demanding a raise.
We need unions that work for us to make sure we get paid with the owner class.
Along what everyone else said, so it's more broadly marketable. In theory a humanoid robot could do any job a real human is doing now, meaning you don't need a high tech production line to go along with it. You don't need to automate your entire production line to get started.
Also, it's more of a commodity. A business could sell the robot once they don't need it and anyone else could just buy it to use for a different purpose. Not many will have a use for highly customised robots ment for a specific task.
I still don't get who these videos are intended to brag to.
It's a showpiece to make the stock go up.
I hope it works. I bought some in September.
Proof of concept. Speed has already increased and it will.
Lots of companies must be looking into humanoid robots and I know they have already been looking into robotic arms
The unions, probably.
What is the point of building faster, if you don't sell enough to begin with...
Smells like wasted investment/money/resources to me...
Markets and investors are not fully rational. They'll jump on a hype because the fear of missing out.