this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
101 points (92.4% liked)

Linux

48461 readers
510 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Right now is the best period of time yet for Firefox-based browser, especially when most alternative browsers are Chrome-based.

While there are a bunch of forks like Librewolf and Palemoon, they provide features mainly for power users like hardened privacy and tweaked user-prefs. A year ago the only fork I knew of, based on recent stable versions of Firefox and added productivity features on top was Floorp. I was very surprised at the hype and sudden popularity of Zen Browser in the past few months and have been curious why it grew so much faster than Floorp which has been around for much longer, look at the Github star graph: https://star-history.com/#zen-browser%2Fdesktop=&Date=. Zen Browser currently has 19.3K stars while Floorp has 6.1K.

Reasons I can think of are the following: heavy promotion of the browser by the devs and community on places like Reddit along with emphasizing its 'zen' philosophy, really fast development (it now has way more features than Floorp), and the Zen mods store, where you can install CSS mods.

What are your thoughts and reasons for Zen Browser becoming so popular so fast? (while its not mainstream, it did grow fast in among Firefox and power users)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gens@programming.dev 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I feel like you are making up words

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I really like Blorpsurfer and Snortscroller instead of those other ones.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Don't make fun of Floorpcoin

[–] arf@lemmy.today 13 points 6 days ago

Zen has the look and polish that makes it not feel like just another Firefox clone. It's how I imagine people feel when using Microsoft Edge and Brave; there's enough there to keep it perceptually separated from its Chrome base.

Floorp was great, but it didn't bring much to the table that you couldn't already tweak yourself with base Firefox. Heck, projects like firebuilder let you build something close with a couple CLI prompts.

[–] macgyver@federation.red 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Floorp causes me a ton of issues on DRM based streaming sites. F1TV being the worst

[–] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

For the record: https://docs.zen-browser.app/faq#why-cant-zen-browser-play-drm-protected-content

Zen Browser currently lacks DRM-support, because it does not have a Widevine license. Acquiring such a license requires the payment of large fees (at least $5,000). ...

[–] Jomn@jlai.lu 4 points 5 days ago

I really enjoy using Zen. It's pretty, has plenty of neat features that don't require extensions, and the development is very active. The software is not yet mature, so it frequently changes behaviours and how things look, so new users need to be aware of that.

I did try Floorp a few months ago, but I didn't like it as much. It felt like using regular Firefox with a few tweaks.

[–] jia_tan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago

Meanwhile that one MacOS user (me) waiting for them to properly integrate with apple’s passwords app and passkeys:

[–] cevn@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Zen has a superior UX out of the box but their decisions have been questionable. Recently Pinned tabs were changed to Essentials for seemingly no reason changing their behavior completely.

[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Pinned tabs still exist in 19a, and essential tabs carry over to other workspaces which pinned tabs don't.

Or is this an upcoming change?

[–] wwwgem@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

While I've tried both, I am not sensitive to any of these trends. I'm just glad to see some alternatives that can fit anyone needs. That's the power of the open-source.

Although I understand the reasoning beyond the language used in this post, I'm sad to read that hardened privacy is considered a power user thing.

[–] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Although I understand the reasoning beyond the language used in this post, I’m sad to read that hardened privacy is considered a power user thing.

What's really sad is the fact you need to make a bunch of convenience tradeoffs and go well out of your way for improved privacy, and on a browser that already has a lot of built-in features for privacy. And a downside of using a Firefox fork is not getting the latest Firefox updates ASAP, you have to wait for the fork to update. It goes to show how privacy-invasive the web is.

[–] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What I'd really like is LibreWolf level privacy protection whilst the browser is running but that allows me to retain cache, history etc but also encrypts everything locally when the browser is closed and is password protected and only decrypts everything when the password is entered.

[–] aksdb@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Is that really a relevent attack vector in your day to day use, that full disk encryption wouldn't cover? My browser is rarely closed when I am on the PC, so it would be accessible (because unlocked).

with linux and kde you could create an encrypted kde vault that’s mounted to your librewolf profile folder (and you can change librewolf settings to save history, cache, etc.)

if you don’t want to use kde, it uses cryfs in the background, which has a cli tool as well. unmount the volume after using the browser and profit i guess, though i do agree with the other commenter that this doesn’t make much sense in my head.

[–] node815@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I deal with an issue with Firefox where it causes my Home Assistant dashboard become non responsive if the tab is not the primary one always on screen. I think it's something with the forced snoozing of tabs. I've tried other Firefox based browsers and face the same problem. So this leaves me with.... Chromium based browsers. As a Linux user, it's either Firefox or Chromium based. With that said, I have not had the issue with the Chromium base, but because it's mostly consumed by Google, I reject it mostly.

I did find that Zen was very nice to look at, and they do have an opinionated way of setting up the tabs (I don't care about the vertical tabs). They also seem to be wanting to roll out their own extension store? In the form of "Zen Mods" but are also cross compatible with Firefox Extensions so that's good I guess. I use a rolling release (Arch) OS, so I do see a lot of updates to Zen, the devs seem to be really working on it. For now - I'm on Firefox dealing with the unusual Home Assistant thing. I've used Firefox since it was before version 1 so I'm a bit stuck in my ways. :)

I really wish that there was another browser engine there which I could use which supports the Adblocking and Bitwarden (My most important extensions). It's a bit disappointing to see that Edge, and all other browsers have adopted the Chromium base. I am hoping that with the latest judgement and order against Google to sell off the Chrome browser, sticks and if so, that the new owner(s) will strip it of some of the garbage which has been forced on the code base. (Manifest v3 comes to mind). The only Chromium based one I tolerate on my system right now is Ungoogled Chrome and Vivaldi, who has said that they are resisting the Manifest V3 as much as they can and have a somewhat decent adblocking built in using their end. Even though I have DNS level adblocking, Ublock Origin fills the gap with some of the ads which gets past my end.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe because Floorp (Additionally which is most likely a fork from a browser named midori), Uses a outdated version of firefox.

[–] TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, Midori is based on Floorp. https://github.com/goastian/midori-desktop

"Midori initially uses the Gecko/Firefox code under the Floorp Browser project."

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ohhh, that would make sense, Shame the browser went this fate.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Let's face it: People aren't gonna take something named 'Floorp' seriously.

If you do, especially to the point you're downvoting this, maybe it's time to ask yourselves why people are not taking you seriously.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 5 days ago

GIMP. Need I say more?

[–] Varyag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

Floorp is made by young Japanese devs. They have uh, very different naming sensibilities...

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not downvoting, but I do quite like that Floorp is just a bit weird. It makes it more fun to use lol.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

I respect that

[–] astro_ray@piefed.social 5 points 6 days ago

Not terribly fond of their icon as well. Personally, I would be willing to look past the name if they had a better icon.

[–] canadaduane@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 week ago (4 children)

There is a certain strain of open source development that is nearly anti-marketing, as far as I can tell. They choose names like "gimp", "git", "frotz", "borg", "pooch", "butt", "slurm", "mutt", "snort", and "floorp".

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago

At least "git" and "mutt" don't feel ridiculous when being pronounced.

The rest are pushing it, but they fill in specific niches that no other tool in their fields can provide, or at least on par with others in their fields.

The same cannot be said about floorp. It sounds ridiculous on your tongue, it looks ridiculous spelled out on the screen, it is just another Firefox fork.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemy.lol 7 points 6 days ago

I love this, we should maintain a list of these, it's like that "Pokémon or web technology?" thing

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can add foot to the list

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

foo terminal foot

[–] R3D4CT3D@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago

ppl laugh when i suggest gimp as a foss alternate to adobe crap. oh well, their loss ¯_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] toastal@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reminder: Microsoft GitHub social media likes is not an accurate barometer of much. Starhacking is a thing & it tells you nothing of the code quality, but just that more authenticated Microsoft accounts, real or fake, have pressed a button—where the more popular/normie/maintstream languages/frameworks get the most signal. You can also read anecdotes thah some folks use this as a bookmark to look at later rather than actually using or enjoying a project.

Free software doesn’t need to rely on a dubious value signal on a proprietary social media platform like MS Github.

[–] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

Reminder: Microsoft GitHub social media likes is not an accurate barometer of much. Starhacking is a thing & it tells you nothing of the code quality

Its funding track record is also pretty good it seems . no indication can prove a project is high quality, but it can help in deciding what to check out.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll start believing or caring about any alternative browsers when I see a big influx of money comming to a browser project. Just grabbing a codebase and changing some settings and releasing it with a new name is not really creating or maintaining a browser. People keep thinking that it's easy to maintain a huge project like a browser by just praying and volunteers.

[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Money isn't important. Some complex software is, in fact, maintained by unpaid volunteers who feel strongly about the project. That doesn't mean it's easy (in fact it's quite difficult to keep the lights on and the code up-to-date), but it is A Thing That Happens despite being difficult.

What is important is the size of the codebase (in the case of a fork, that's the code either written for the fork or code that the fork preserves and maintains that isn't in the original anymore), the length of time it's been actively worked on, and the bus factor. Some would-be browser forks are indeed trivial and ephemeral one-man shows. Others have years of active commit history, carry tens or even hundreds of thousands of lines of novel or preserved code, and have many people working on them.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What complex codebase is maintained by unpaid volunteers.

Yeah I think most complex and long-term OSS projects have "employed" contributors paid by donations or sponsorships (e.g. Linux, Blender, LibreOffice, ...)

[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A whole bunch of non-user-facing projects providing vital libraries that are largely ignored until something blows up in people's faces, as happened with openssl some years ago. Some of them contain quite a bit of code (for example, ffmpeg, which underpins a lot of open-source media playback software). Among browsers specifically, Pale Moon has been around for years, is maintaining a lot of code no longer carried by Firefox along with a fair amount of original code, and has no cash source beyond user donations, which might stretch to paying for the servers in a good month.

The projects with corporate sponsorship, or even a steady flow of large donations, are in the minority. There's a reason the xkcd about the "project some random person in Nebraska has been thanklessly maintaining since 2003" exists.

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

you're confusing importance with complexity

openssl is a vital part of the web, but it is a small tool

pale moon leverages the hundreds of thousands of person-hours put into firefox up until the fork. the work they put on their original code is negligible in comparison

there is literally no project led by unpaid volunteers that's able to output the amount of work necessary to maintain a browser and keep it up to date with web standards, let alone add new features

[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

openssl is a vital part of the web, but it is a small tool

You consider 61.7MB of source code "small"? (That's for openssl 3.3.2, and may not include some rust code that isn't in the gzipped main code package.) I think maybe you need to recalibrate a bit.

[–] bunitor@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

firefox is larger and more fast-paced

[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago

You just said "large". I would consider any project with 10MB or more of source "large". Firefox is certainly large by that standard, but so is openssl. If your standard for "large" is "has at least as much code as Firefox", then according to you, the Linux kernel is a small project.

[–] chris@lem.cochrun.xyz 20 points 1 week ago

No clue why except i think people are mostly just really fed up with Mozilla making a non profit about everything but their browser. I could see a lot of people prefer the name and the willingness to try new stuff compared to floorp.

But really i think most of it is it's very different from Firefox and people are tired of Firefox.... But still hate chromium.

load more comments
view more: next ›