this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
526 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

59772 readers
3115 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bblkargonaut@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I haven't found an article yet that can actually articulate the problem with 23 and me right now, and actually did research into it or even read the terms and service. The problem with 23 and me is that they are not maximizing the share holder value of the data they are sitting on. The CEO wants to keep the company in line with the principals they were founded on which is to protect the privacy and data of their customers, while using opt in studies to build data sets that can be studied or sold.

Investors want to enshittify the company, and have been organizing a campaign against to company to try to drive it into liquidation to buy the data, even though the company is profitable. I wouldn't be surprised is they are funding these weekly omfg 23 and me bad articles.

That juicy data is going to get bought up by the health insurance industry. I would be surprised if they aren’t part of the push to force them to sell the data.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I am a technology journalist – I like to think I am thoughtful about what data I share with corporations.

My brother in Christ, if you are a tech journalist then you, out of all people, should know not to give ANY data to corporations. That is a massive fuckup regarding your job.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oh, don't worry. If you hadn't given it to them, one or ten of your fucking rellies did anyway and had no clue of the implications either.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I want to upvote this, but ... Why did you have to shorten "relatives"?

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I love how they just smash "-ies" onto any word. I started using "sunnies" for sunglasses after hanging out with a few aussies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 186 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (37 children)

Americans seem get really weird with the whole ancestry thing. There appears to be a desire to look into your family history and find something "exotic", which basically seems to mean non-English - I imagine because that's perceived as the 'default' ancestry, so-to-speak.

Honestly, who the fuck cares? What difference does it make? Nationalities aren't Skyrim races. You don't get special abilities. It makes no difference whether your ancestors were British/Irish/Spanish/French/whatever.

E: This is obviously not intended as a hateful statement, people. You have to understand that the rest of the world doesn't care about this, so we're confused when we look to the US and see them take it so seriously. We're especially puzzled when Americans say "I'm Irish" because their great great great uncle bought a pint of Guiness in the 1870s. It's an alien concept to the rest of the planet.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Nationalities aren't Skyrim races. You don't get special abilities.

"It wasn't until I learned that I was 90% British that it all made sense... my inhuman ability to queue for hours, my fastidiousness surrounding permits, and hatred for the French... I knew I was special, but I never imagined how special."

[–] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 76 points 3 days ago (12 children)

I worked with a French guy in Amsterdam. His parents were Portuguese, but he was born and raised in France. As far as he was concerned, he was French.

Contrariwise, I worked with an American woman in Virginia. Her grandparents were Irish, and she considered herself Irish, in spite of having been born and raised in America, and both of her parents having been born and raised in America.

It is a kind of fetish in America to hyphenate yourself. Irish-American. Cuban-American. And so on.

My own theory is that this is because America has no culture going back many generations, so people try to find one.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's even more strange when I see 3rd or 4th generation children from immigrants call themselves "Greek" or "Italian" and many times they've never even stepped inside those countries nor speak the language

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Or even worse, they think that they do some typical Italian food when in fact, if you gave that food to Italians, they would be disgusted.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (8 children)

What's with the negativity from you and the other comments?

I can tell you why Americans care. Because identity matters to people. The story of the melting pot is central to the American story as a nation of immigrants (even today) and central to individual identities. Thus, there is a lot of interest in backgrounds and geneology. If you ask the average American about their heritage you're likely to get a surprising answer - so people talk about it more.

I get why it seems weird to many other cultures - if you ask the average French person (for example) their heritage they'll say 'French as far back as we can tell'.

The French person celebrates their identity through the lens of the French story, and the American does too, it's just that the American story is the immigrant story.

I hope you do actually care. I hope in this era of rising nationalism and online hate enough of us value diversity of backgrounds and ancestries.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You speak for yourself. As an Englishman I get 5% water resistance and +2 charisma when dealing with non-Europeans.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Europeans: haha you guys have no history!

Also Europeans: haha you're curious where your family emigrated from! Losers!

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 10 points 3 days ago

Those two sentences are not in contradiction. USA's history has been moved to casinos. Knowing which language your ancestors spoke, when you won't bother learning it, has nothing to do with it.

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

We are in 2024 and they still use the word "race" to segregate the American population in several groups. So no surprise a DNA service could be so popular in the USA.

If they were American citizen and just that - without subdivision and the legal right to ask or use their gene, color skin or whatever_they_think_is_important_to_distinguish_themself - well a lot of issues and strange "behaviour" (aka racisme) would have disapeared.

Or at least decreased as nobody would have the legal tools and data to enforce it: gerrymanding, blaming a vote on a "community", having your town split in "community" sectors and no shame at all to call it like that officially! Which others country put "chinatown" on their map?

As a teenager, I was shocked by this fact when visiting the USA 25 years ago. That and the fact i have found in a normal marketplace unprotected ammunition sold near the baby milk. "baby stuff, baby stuff, 9mm ammo... what!?!"

This DNA service is just the result of this global problem: the american society and its laws are still allowing passive racism.

So americans want to prove (to themself, to others?) via DNA results that they can’t be racist because they have a ~~black friend~~ sorry : black DNA ancestors.

Some will tell you: "ho it’s just for fun". But is fun really the only motivation here?

And congrat to them as they don’t only expose themself (genetic data are priceless and should be protected at all costs) but also they expose all their children, children's children, etc. These chidren probably wouldn’t have agreed to that if they were born.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 days ago

Kinda weird obsession when a big part of the population hates strangers so much.

And even British/Irish/Spanish/.... doesn't mean much as there was mixing for centuries

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I had in some ways the opposite 23&Me experience and goals. My parents told me growing up that I had some small native ancestry. This is actually a common myth many Americans have either been told or somehow deluded themselves into believing.

So I did the DNA testing (which I now regret from all the obvious enshittification and privacy reasons) to prove that my ancestry was boring and predictable. Which it was, no indigenous ancestry, just the expected European countries that my great grandparents came from.

They also do a lot of nice health screening things and I think that's probably the much more valuable aspect of it. It really is very American that people are so much more concerned with what DNA says about one's race or ethnicity than about their health and wellbeing.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

I'm worried about insurance companies getting it and changing rates/services based on my DNA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Took me too long to realise that article is actually serious. I'd have sworn white people with huge ethnics fetish would show up as "Austrian painter" on their test, but I guess British works. Oh well 🇺🇸

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Recreational DNA testing eventually led to discovering that I had never before met my biological father. Mom got it wrong. I met him and his family this summer finally. I am slightly irritated that my last name (and my child’s) is now kind of meaningless, and it’s too much of a hassle to change it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RebekahWSD@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (24 children)

I refuse to do it because I'm a twin. We both agree that it's shitty if one of us does it because then the other is forced into it basically, being identical.

Also our dad was a piece of cheating shit so we don't ever want to know about that possibility.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 41 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe if I swab my mouth and send it off to a company, I'll finally be interesting and people will like me.

puts letter down

...maybe not.

[–] Grunt4019@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On this topic, I did ancestrydna long before I got concerned with my data and privacy. I have since deleted my data and had them destroy my physical sample as well (which took them a long time). But I wonder if the damage is done and even though they say they deleted and destroyed the sample how can I know for sure? Etc

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know James Smith, from Phoenix, Arizona. Social security number 523-098-1322. Is your data safe?

Imagine how you'd freak out if I, by change, got it right.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

What the hell?! You got mine right!

Not really, but it would have been cool. Also, socials are 9 digits in the US.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 44 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There's something hilarious about the author's disappointment to find out they're British, and nothing else.

Can't say I blame them though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I still find it funny people think these tests mean anything. "you have these 7/9 genes in common with Jasper Brittania and are therefore 77% british"

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Stories tend to disappear with the passing away of living memory. These tests are a hope to revive a story of where we came from. It doesn't, obviously, but I can't blame people for want.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I did it over 15 years ago, but for health information before the FDA nuked that. (Although you can still run the raw data through a third party program)

I'm pretty sure I already uploaded myself to at least one open source database, so I don't see any reason to worry that much.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Like honestly, I'd rather be open sourced than sold as proprietary data haha

In either case the actors to worry about (whatever they might be) gets access, in the latter case it might additionally do some good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I’ve got to admit, I’ve wanted to do one of those tests just because my family is such a mix of “lol we don’t know.” Like, no really, what IS my maternal grandma? She does not look like the rest of her family and had a different family name from her siblings. And ok really, where DID my paternal great-grandmother who lied about her race so she could marry my great-grandfather back when “miscegenation” was illegal, come from? And WAS that great-grandpa biracial himself?

There’s a reason I call myself an ethnic Rorschach test, and I’d love to know why it is I am. But the rest of my family is against the idea of finding out because “it doesn’t matter” plus who knows how just data might be used one day.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›