this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16858 readers
715 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

As someone who hasn't been following this at all...these are comparable to recent cards? I read the article and they did a benchmark against the RTX 4060 which was released last year. Are these more for casual gamer rigs? I guess I'm trying to figure out if these are a good choice for a rog I'm currently building for my teen.

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'd wait for independent reviews. The first wave of Intel GPUs had a lot of issues, mostly related to drivers. From what I understand Intel has come a long way on the driver front in the past year, but we don't have a clear picture on their overall state with the new parts. Reviewers like GamersNexus will call out whether the current state of the drivers are good enough for a recommendation, or if Intel still has more ground to cover.

[–] Toes@ani.social 7 points 8 hours ago

dx12 and Vulkan titles work fairly well is my understanding.

battlemage is expected to come with much better dx11 support.

Older directx games are getting their calls remapped to Vulkan. This is where most of the problems existed. But it's much much better than at launch. When they weren't doing that is my understanding.

My understanding is OpenGL games work fine.

Anyone reading this let me know if anything I said isn't accurate.

[–] Toes@ani.social 4 points 8 hours ago

We'll know for sure once people have them.

But the rumours say that it's expected to be 30% faster than the 4060.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Intel's 5 series GPUs are meant for the low-middle to middle range of the market. They are targeted at 1440p (and under) gaming and the B580 with 12G of VRAM will almost certainly perform perfectly fine.

If you are more concerned about performance but are on a budget then wait for the eventual 7 series ARC GPU or grab a 4060ti.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

On paper they look really good to me. It's only 9 days until launch of the more expensive one so maybe worth holding off for proper benchmarks if you can?

edit: Unless it's a Christmas present I suppose!

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Haha appreciate the forethought. Yeah I'm going to hold off until more info is available. Looks promising though!!

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 hours ago

These cards sound good, but I'm generally soured on Intel as a company. It'll be years before I feel comfortable buying hardware from them.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 6 points 11 hours ago

Sounds like a decent budget card.