Technology

Question, and this may not be the perfect place for this, but is it the phrasing that LGBTQ is a mental "illness" that's the problem here, or that it's a mental attribute at all?

I'm an LGBT supporter, so I'm not coming at this from a place of malice, I suppose it's curiosity and ignorance. Don't we basically understand that the way we function as humans is all a part of our brain chemistry, and that certain deviations from the norm cause things like ADD, homosexuality, musical creativity, etc etc?

The word illness seems way too strong, as we as a society have decided we don't have anything against that personal trait/lifestyle/whatever, but as far as natural occurrences goes homosexuality must be considered a mental abnormality, no?

Again I don't want to get caught up in feelings here, because I think people will hear that and take offence to it since no one wants to be "abnormal" but that is the concensus is it not?

Fecesbook is crap. Crap take from a crappy data salesman with nothing but crap to sell. I can't wait until it eats itself from all the bots.

feel free to be heroes and leak meta's source code before leaving.

Better late than never.

Meta employees suddenly discovering their conscience is a bit rich.

i think I've finally reached peak zuckerberg, i don't want to read one more thing about facebook or meta or whatever

He is going to be bare ass naked running down the halls screaming for employees to "come at me bro"

If you have a problem with it, organize a Facebook union. The only way small voices matter to CEOs are when they speak collectively.

Good to know that there’s still some decent people there.

announced content moderation changes that will allow users to say that LGBTQ+ people have “mental illness,”

Someone gets triggered by free speech here.

Anyway, wind blows the other way now. Zuck doesn't want to piss against it