this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
115 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59653 readers
2765 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's one hell of a chip cluster, that must be an outright insane amount of chips. I wonder what they plan to use it for?
Oh it's a fab cluster, that does make more sense. ๐Ÿ˜‹

Jokes aside, 7.7 million wafers per month by 2030, sounds like quite a bold plan, I suppose they expect a huge increase for the market, because right now, I think that would flood the market, and Intel is building too. So I guess the future looks sweet for heavy electronics users. ๐Ÿ˜€

[โ€“] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

When deciding if something related to making chips makes sense, I think you also need to consider geopolitical risk. From what I understand, a pretty large chunk of the world's semiconductor manufacturing is in Taiwan, and there's a significant chance it will all be taken over by China at some point. Meanwhile relations between China and the West are steadily deteriorating, and semiconductors are constantly becoming more essential to the world economy.

As an analogy, imagine a scenario where most of the world's petroleum production was controlled by the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. It's something a lot of world governments would have a vested interest in avoiding.

[โ€“] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yes Intel has used that to get more funding from governments around the world for building their new factories, and they are building in Europe, USA and Israel.
TSMC is building factories outside Taiwan too for geopolitical reasons, and probably to secure the business in case of a Chinese invasion. Rumor has it that their Taiwan sites are rigged with explosives to make them worthless in case of a Chinese invasion.
Now Samsung adds a whopping 16 factories to the mix, but I bet Samsung wouldn't do that to save the world, they do it to make money.

[โ€“] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Promising 3M high paying jobs outside of Seoul; sounds like a good way to increase political popularity, whether it succeeds (thanks to the government) or fails (because of the companies not willing to cooperate, at least the government did their best).

Probably a much needed distraction after the Itaewon crush caused by the poor police response and after they bullied an internationally famous actor into suicide.

[โ€“] themurphy@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Remember that Taiwan is a big player in the semiconductor market, and their fate will always be kinda risky because of China.

This is a way to spread out the eggs to other baskets, so the world is not so reliant on a small independent (for now) country.