Can't have a UE5 game without spending a lot of time discussing performance.
My PC is pretty decent, but whenever I hear a game runs on UE5 I just figure I'll pick it up on sale in 5-10 years when I have newer hardware.
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
46 points (89.7% liked)
Games
20151 readers
577 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Lol, right on time to exemplify what I mentioned on the Kotic piece by the same outlet.
The disconnect is real between the games "journalists" and the YouTubers who actually played the game:
What the fuck is up with all of these glowing opinions, just from the large games "journalists" sites? Are they getting paid by Obsidian?
This is looking like another Outer Worlds or Starfield situation. Hype the shit about it, make sure the major sites give it high scores, and then months later, when people actually play it, the scorn and mid-ness of the game is too hard to ignore.
I loved The Outer Worlds. If you're going to pay people for positive press, why would you only get a 7/10 out of IGN?
Luke Stephens is not a good source
Then look at the other sources.