this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
970 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3615 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 38 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Good thing I erased Google out of my life a decade ago meaning I can much easier block even more of their everywhere present garbage and not have issues.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Ditching gmail remains one of the best choices I've made in years.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Waldschrat@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

But why would any browser accept access to those metadata so freely? I get that programming languages can find out about the environment they are operating in, but why would a browser agree to something like reading installed fonts or extensions without asking the user first? I understand why Chrome does this, but all of the mayor ones and even Firefox?

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Firefox has built-in tracking protection.

[–] Waldschrat@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I know that it has that in theory, but my Firefox just reached a lower score on https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/ (which was posted in this threat, thanks!) than a Safari. Firefox has good tracking protection but has an absolute unique fingerprint, was 100% identifiable as the first on the site, as to Safari, which scored a bit less in tracking but had a not unique fingerprint.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kcap@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

We need Richard Hendricks and his new internet asap

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

new? isn't this at least like a decade old method of tracking?

[–] LeTak@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Using Mullvad Browser + Mullvad VPN could mitigate this a little bit. Because if you use it as intended (don’t modify Mullvad browser after installation) , all Mullvad users would have the same browser fingerprint and IPs from the same pool.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

Digital fingerprinting is a method of data collection – one that in the past has been refused by Google itself because it “subverts user choice and is wrong.” But, we all remember that Google removed “Don’t be evil” from its Code of Conduct in 2018. Now, the Silicon Valley tech giant has taken the next step by introducing digital fingerprinting.

Oh, forgot to mention - we're evil now. Ha! Okay, into the chutes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›