this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
119 points (82.2% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
3236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

El Pais paywall can be disabled via reader view in your web browser.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 28 minutes ago
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

I dunno, everyone was cool with the love story of Wanda & The Vision from the MCU. I guess fucking robots is not ok, but becoming emotionally attached to one is?

[–] figjam@midwest.social 2 points 2 hours ago

I will get a sex robot when it can scoop catboxes and fold laundry.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Realistically how is a man going to design a good sex robot for a woman? Let a woman do that, they'll get what they want.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Women already have the perfect sex bot. It's called a Sybian.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

And if that Sybian could pick you up, and stroke your thighs, massage your breasts, have hips and legs to simulate the sexual positions that it can't provide you, while still being what it is, there is a huge room for improvement on the design of the sybian and what great things it does

[–] leftover@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Syban is probably designed by a man.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

...in the early 1980s, he teamed up with a female physician who believed in the idea. They spent the next 18 months gathering research, asking for insights and meeting with engineers who could bring the product to life.

From inception to prototyping to how the Sybian performs today wasn’t a “one and done” process. Years of research, conducting interviews and refinement went into its creation. As the creator himself says, “Sybian is not the result of what I thought it should be, but the collective input of many women.”

You can't seriously think the ultimate female orgasm machine was invented without women? Plenty of videos that will back me on the "ultimate" part!

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Probably a group of engineers so maybe not all men, Sybian is just like the penultimate vibrator, would be a fun engineering challenge, but it's also a marketable challenge which would be why it exists

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Penultimate? Which one is the ultimate then?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago)

Sybian doesn't do everything it could do, so i didn't want to call it the ultimate. But it does not seem to have any contenders that aren't knock offs so it does feel like a Pinnacle as a vibrator if not as a sex toy

I wanted to show for what comes next. Maybe I'm wrong and there isn't, but a sybian that can view your reactions and learn each users unique preferences would be an improvement

A sybian as the hips of a sex robot maybe? Like its fine, but its just a box , you get on to get off and then it is done with you. Theres no after care or anything else.

I guess a portable discreet version will require entirely new components that we probably cant manufacture yet, or are cost prohibited.

I dunno what the ultimate is, so penultimate seems a good choice to use if i can see improvements to it that dont yet exist

[–] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In this case penultimate is used to describe something that is nearly perfect. As if to say, there is little room for improvement.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

Penultimate means "next to last", and that's it.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

✅: Does what it's asked to do

✅: Doesn't talk back

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I'd kill to get my wife one, but that $1,300 tag gives me sticker shock.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago (1 children)

Your phone is probably worth that much

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

Yes, but the vibrator in your phone isn't 75% of the user interface.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But with that money you can give her the ride of her life...

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

Repeatability is king! :)

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago

You're telling me women don't like vibrators.

every time I see crap like this it make me think about that 30rock porn for women skit with Tina Fey

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago

Speak for yourself. Gimme that drama free dick.

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm no expert on attraction, but what if the sex robot looked like a skeleton?

[–] Lawnman23@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I want to get off Mr. Bones Wild Ride.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 7 points 8 hours ago

Well i guess im a woman then lol

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 218 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (5 children)

I guess a vibrator isn't a type of sex robot?

Just saying that these sort of toys were way more normalized for women long before they were for men.

A man with a fleshlight was a gross weirdo, a woman with a vibrator is a strong independent woman taking control of her sexuality and not settling for the weakness of flesh in men.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 8 hours ago

This was my thought. Its the same way all our technology has grown. Honestly I think brain interfaces could eclipse robots like this before they are that great. As scary as that is.

[–] python@lemmy.world 38 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Colloquially, the word "robot" always implies a certain amount of anthropomorphism. So no, I don't think a vibrator would count, as basically no vibrators on the market try to look human-like.

But that definitely is a weird difference between male and female sexuality - the sex toys women buy most are the very effective and utilitarian ones: Vibrator wands, Rabbits, Air pulse Vibrators etc.

While the most popular tools for men tend to focus on "realism"(?): Fleshlights, Sex Dolls, things like VR and POV porn. And I guess sex robots would fall into that category too in the future.

I can absolutely see the weirdness-factor of someone who is desperately trying to emulate a partner rather than just accept masturbation as a solo activity and optimize it from there 😬

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Slap a pair of googly eyes on it and it as good as has a soul.

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 45 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

A robot doesn't need to be anthropomorphic, an assembly line robot is still a robot. It does however need to be able to perform some actions autonomously, for which a vibrator hardly qualifies.

[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago

It does however need to be able to perform some actions autonomously, for which a vibrator hardly qualifies.

Fuck Machine has entered the chat

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 22 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Overpriced pornstar-branded fleshlights aren't the only masturbators in town and it's not like there's no life-like dildos either. The long and short of it is that the mechanics of a lubed hole are superior to that of a hand and you're not looking at the entry point all the time so noone actually cares what they look like.

Yes, the branded stuff does exist, humans, male female, doesn't matter, enter parasocial relationships news at 11. Can you imagine how well Justin Bieber dildos would sell.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] towelie@lemm.ee 63 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Sex with a hella sexy robot? Nice.

Using a hella sexy robot to fill the emptiness of no intimacy or authentic mutual connection? Not nice.

For some reason sex with a robot doesn't feel gross to me — until they start using it to fill a hole (hehe)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

What about for people who struggle to have emotional intimacy and sexual intimacy throughout their lives because of medical issues or mental health issues?

My ex has a brother who is now pushing 40 and has never even held a woman's hand. He has severe mental disabilities and will never live life on his own without some kind of caretaker. We know he looked at porn, partially because he refused to ever let people fix up his computer, usually out of fear of people seeing his porn.

Does he not deserve emotional and sexual intimacy? There is a high likelihood he will never have it otherwise.

until they start using it to fill a hole

What about, like in the situation I just described, when that hole will otherwise go a lifetime of being unfulfilled? Is that fair to them for being born a way they didn't choose?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

They don't ~~that~~ have that much appeal to me as well, and I'm a dude.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 17 hours ago (20 children)
[–] powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 hours ago

and this is why uBlock origin is the be all end all of extensions.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

In these sexual relationships, availability and consent will always be taken for granted, something that’s never taken for granted in a sexual relationship with another human being.

People could get used to interacting in a way in which the other person isn’t taken into account as much, meaning that sexual partners could be instrumentalized for the purpose of having sex. That is to say the ‘human-humanoid’ interaction could be transferred to the relationship between two human beings.

Unfortunately, however, these advances aren’t being accompanied by deep reflections about the consequences that sex with robots can have.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 11 points 10 hours ago

never taken for granted

In healthy relationships anyway

load more comments
view more: next ›