this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1214 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
4044 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] uis@lemm.ee 13 points 20 hours ago

Vote pirate party.

[–] azalty@jlai.lu 5 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (8 children)

Why? Nothing they've shat out is good for anything anyway.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ferroto@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago
[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago

If I had to pay tuition for education (buying text books, pay for classes and stuff), then you have to pay me to train your stupid AI using my materials.

[–] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Sounds good, fuck em

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

What's wrong with the sentiment expressed in the headline? AI training is not and should not be considered fair use. Also, copyright laws are broken in the west, more so in the east.

We need a global reform of copyright. Where copyrights can (and must) be shared among all creators credited on a work. The copyright must be held by actual people, not corporations (or any other collective entity), and the copyright ends after 30 years or when the all rights holders die, whichever happens first. That copyright should start at the date of initial publication. The copyright should be nontransferable but it should be able to be licensed to any other entity only with a majority consent of all rights holders. At the expiration of the copyright the work in question should immediately enter the public domain.

And fair use should be treated similarly to how it is in the west, where it's decided on a case-by-case basis, but context and profit motive matter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] __UnicornPower__@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an artist, kindly get fucked ass hole. I'd like compensation for all the work of mine you stole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"How are we supposed to win the race if we can't cheat?!"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shaquilleoatmeal@lemm.ee 45 points 1 day ago

“The plagiarism machine will break without more things to plagiarize.”

[–] SaraTonin@lemm.ee 9 points 21 hours ago

Musk has an AI project. Techbros have deliberately been sucking up to Trump. I’m pretty sure AI training will be declared fair use and copyright laws will remain the same for everybody else.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good, end this AI bullshit, it has little upsides and a metric fuckton of downsides for the common man

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psyspoop@lemm.ee 152 points 1 day ago (22 children)

But I can't pirate copyrighted materials to "train" my own real intelligence.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

Okay.

It was fun while it lasted.

For someone.

I presume.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›