this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
194 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

69098 readers
4321 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] termaxima@jlai.lu 2 points 3 weeks ago

An insult to life itself.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Is this fashion comeback ? Style transfer was popular 10 years ago.

[–] J52@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 weeks ago

There's a word for it that describes the perpetrators well: BARBARIC. (and still, might will never equal right !)

[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Potentially unpopular opinion, but I don't think art or artstyles should be copyrighted.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

They aren't, thankfully

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Sucks because ghibli has always been really protective of its ip and in the future it maybe made harder and harder to watch it.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I feel like they're reading too much into this.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I see it as enabling people to make images in a style they admire and would like to draw but don't personally have the skill. To me the concept of copyright is the only difference between AI art generators and say, springy leg braces that let you slam dunk like Kareem Abdul Jabbar. I understand there are business ramifications some people might object to, but I don't get the moralistic part of the outrage. Maybe somebody can help me understand by explaining it rationally without screaming or calling me names, but spitting rage at me is pointless.

edit: from the abundance of downvotes and lack of explanation I take it people know they're supposed to be outraged but don't know why. The telltale mark of meme culture, wear it proudly!

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The moralistic outrage is that people still have an outdated concept of intellectual property, and a blanket fear of corporations owning technological progress.

The truth is, no one can actually own an idea or style. But we have laws that try to make it a real thing. Because of regulatory capture, copyright truly only benefits corporations with lots of money, not all the little indie artists that actually would need it.

Hell, most these indie artists make their money drawing and selling fanart, which is the most literal definition of copying. Yet no one worries about that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›