this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

35697 readers
145 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Incredible to think about that we got it right the first time (with email) and still had to spend the last 20 years complaining about centralized social networks.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 4 months ago

For fucks sake, have the 0 at the twelve o clock position and not this horrible mess. This ruins one's day.

[โ€“] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is a terrible distribution and the semi-centralisation and gatekeeping by the established actors is one of the reason email is dying.

I think we can do much better than that ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Email has been "dying" for 20+ years. I'll believe it when I see it.

[โ€“] HubertManne@piefed.social 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

yeah its hard for an essential service to die. I will spout one of my super downvoted opinions but I think every government should be providing email service the same way they provide physical mail service. With all the rights currently given to physical mail. Im not saying as the only option and im being idealistic in thinking we can do like what we did with physical mail in this modern time. But I don't care. Its essential and there should be a version people have that is a right and cannot go away.

[โ€“] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why the USPS shouldn't be the sole provider of email in the US.

[โ€“] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why in the world should it be?

[โ€“] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No profit motive and no private interests.

I'm sure there could still be private carriers, just like there's still private delivery services like UPS and FedEx, but I don't see why the average person should be relying on a private company for essential infrastructure.

[โ€“] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You really trust the US government to control your communications? Especially given the last 20 years?

There exist plenty of free email platforms right now. I'm not against the government providing one, but unlike physical packages, sending an email to Bumfuck, Missouri doesn't cost any more than sending it across town.

There's the cost of the ISP, and for that I think there should be a municipal option for sure, to provide service to unprofitable regions just like postal mail and rural electrification.

[โ€“] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago

There's a reason they're trying to destroy and privatize USPS. It's highly unionized and the workers won't let them use USPS against us.

Also, while we're at it, USPS should also provide municipal internet.

[โ€“] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I really do want to point out, Gmail is gonna get a massive lead as time goes on.
Doing parental consent forms for my schools library, most of the parents email were yahoo, Hotmail, etc. but EVERY SINGLE student email was Gmail, with the exception of like 10 out of (at least) 300 pages

(edit: to clarify, 300 pages is 300 emails)

[โ€“] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of that has to do wtih chromebooks.

[โ€“] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago

Android seems far more likely cause.

[โ€“] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Been on Gmail since it was invite only. It really is best in class. Hate on Google all ya like, but they got a lock on email early in the game.

And for those that think getting away from it is a matter of choosing another email provider, I'll say that Gmail does loads more than deliver email. Authentication is a huge and obvious use. Reading comments around here leads me to believe that many don't understand Google for Business and how integrated an org can be with those services.

Another note, just because the domain isn't gmail.com doesn't mean it isn't served by Google. For most companies it would be insane to host their own services and cheaper to let Google handle it all.

[โ€“] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The raw SMTP landscape on the internet is such a shitshow. Setting up a SMTP server requires so many goddamn condoms that you might as well just give up and start using some other professional email service. Or you set it up just to forward email to a GMail account, and even then, Gmail bitches about how much spam you're forwarding it and blocks you for a time.

[โ€“] quokka1@mastodon.au 1 points 3 months ago

@p03locke @shalafi i have a primary email that uses a TLD released in 2014. I use it for any mails that aren't e.g. government or financial. The number of systems/servers/transports that haven't been updated to accept it is quite an annoyance.
I avoid email anyway.

[โ€“] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago
[โ€“] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It'll probably follow Zipf's law, like most things.

[โ€“] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Okay, based on that article Zipf's law seems to mostly apply to languages. Cities, for example, don't follow it.

[โ€“] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Zipf's law is just a specific example of a power law. Other power laws exist for lots of different things, just with different exponents.

the jury seems out about cities. This paper suggests they don't follow a other distributions: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275124002592 , but this one suggests that they do: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2013/12/on-city-size-distribution_g17a2442/5k3tt100wf7j-en.pdf - specifically it suggests they DO follow Zipf's law, within a given country. Inter-country differences are likely due to different developmental trajectories over time.

[โ€“] Michal@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The thing about email is that the software is proprietary. Each of these providers has their own implementation of the interface, features, and integration with their tools (Google drive, photos, etc).

As long as lemmy servers run lemmy software, this won't happen, or at least won't be an issue as you can move to another server and not have to change your usage habits.

However if some server owners decide to fork Lemmy and develop their proprietary server, overhaul the UI, add features and attract users, it will start to become a problem.

[โ€“] nutomic@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

Lemmy's AGPL license doesnt allow forking the code into a proprietary server. All changes need to be open source as well, otherwise the operator can get sued. So a proprietary Lemmy software would have to be developed from scratch which would take a long time.

[โ€“] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Email had standardized protocols and clients for 50 years, and still does.

[โ€“] Michal@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Most people just use the web interface

[โ€“] ripcord@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Maybe you do.

They didn't use to, anyway.

But also what you're describing is a solved problem and you'd think it'd be nice for you to learn that.

[โ€“] not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 4 months ago

federation and the concept of communities have always been a little awkward together since it's based on sunreddits where there is only one always.

The only ways this pans out is with having one server where the community is most successful to eat up the others or having like two or three who hate each other