this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
62 points (84.4% liked)

Technology

69154 readers
3140 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some lawmakers think additional guardrails are needed for future uses. For now, the facility will use AI to comply with regulations

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] who@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago

Diablo Canyon, California’s sole remaining nuclear power plant, has been left for dead on more than a few occasions over the last decade or so, and is currently slated to begin a lengthy decommissioning process in 2029.

So this AI is apparently not operating a nuclear plant, which would be concerning.

For now, the artificial intelligence tool named Neutron Enterprise is just meant to help workers at the plant navigate extensive technical reports and regulations — millions of pages of intricate documents from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that go back decades — while they operate and maintain the facility.

Ah, that makes more sense. I hope it doesn't end up leading humans away from correct understanding of safety regulations.

[–] AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

We really should distinguish between a Algorithm, a LLM and AI

They are very different things, if you let a LLM run your nuclear reactor you're in for a bad time.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For now, the artificial intelligence tool named Neutron Enterprise is just meant to help workers at the plant navigate extensive technical reports and regulations — millions of pages of intricate documents from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that go back decades — while they operate and maintain the facility.

As long as the data sets is directly from the technical documents without out interference, it sounds fine to me.

We probably spend about 15,000 hours a year searching through our multiple databases and records and procedures,” Zawalick said. “And that’s going to shrink that time way down.”

I am very curious on how much this will actually help.

I am also curious if reorganizing the database and training the staff would've been a better or worse time saver.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am also curious if reorganizing the database and training the staff would’ve been a better or worse time saver.

That's literally what this is though. There is no actual "AI". They've just got a new search algorithm.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 0 points 1 week ago

Sounds like a waste of a quarter of a million dollars then.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Spoiler: There is no "AI".

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

My company recently released a beta "AI" tool to do similar.

What I've found but was 0% surprised by, our documentation has conflicts. It still takes an experienced, knowledgeable person to notice that there's a conflict, then dive into source documentation to resolve them.

What going to happen is they think they can cheap out on hiring/retaining employees with those abilities.

I would bet a dollar the documentation in nuclear has similar conflicts and similar if not greater experienced human knowledge to resolve them.

I also do auditing/compliance and I would love to be a fly on the wall while they explain the chain of logic and objective evidence that it works leading to offloading tasks to AI.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The closest conflicts I have seen is varying codes required and there is usually clear language to use the strictest code. For example one code might require piping with 1/8” thickness if it holds water at X pressure and another will requires 3/16” thickness if that water is going to have a chloride content above X amount so you if it meets both you use the 3/16”.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

This is the same as just passing -y

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Has no one seen The Forbin Project?

[–] J52@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 week ago

Didn't read, first thought on headline: 'ah, just great, what could go wrong?' (Sarcasm - for those in doubt)

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago