this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
192 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

69098 readers
4321 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did zucko not pay his protection money?

[–] einlander@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is where people make mistakes. When you pay protection the payments must never stop otherwise retribution will follow. Zuck forgot about that part.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

What, he assuemd a one time payment was good enough? Nonono this isn't how it works You paying up shows you can KEEP paying up.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t need to know anything about it so long as the FTC is non-credible.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

It's going to be "become Truth Social 2 or else we'll break your company's legs" from the Trump admin now.

[–] Hafty@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] 7355608@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I doubt it. I am not a lawyer in any way. The layman in me, with his tinfoil hat thinks that the FTC are trying to throw this case. So that Meta and anyone else they do this for will have precedent to make a break up in the future harder.

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am a bit curious to where this will go, I agree it looks to be what you say, an opportunity to throw the case and get a ruling that will fortify things against a breakup.

On the other hand Musk despises the Zuck and is petty enough to work towards breaking up Zuckerberg's empire behind the scenes. He would love to buy up chunks of it.

[–] 7355608@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This a good point, and seems very plausible. Technocrats trying to fuck with each other using the courts is almost traditional at this point.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I know Meta Zucked Trump's peen and this will go nowhere.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Zuck... must've forgotten his protection money to El Crapo.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So, let’s say they split up Meta. Does it become six different companies? Or do people like Elon and Bezos to get to pick over the remains? Hopefully the former and not the latter. I’m still pissed They let Meta buy Instagram and WhatsApp in the first place.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago
[–] takeda@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Did Zuck's check not clear yet?

[–] techforwhat@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Tech Policy Press outlet is a great news source. I do, however, wish they had more optimistic stories like an interview with a small business in the EU that is seriously benefiting from the interoperability requirements of the DMA. Everything is pretty doom and gloom. Anyway, this is not very related to the article itself posted here which is some great (not necessarily gloomy) reporting 🙂

EDIT: DMA not DNA lol

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Suckerberg is a robot but he is way better at selling things than Musk.