this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
349 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

70266 readers
4245 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gressen@lemm.ee 266 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The printer company is called Procolored.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Also it’s for a UV printer, not an inkjet or laser printer, with the cheapest option on their website being $1900 and the average being around $6000. So, not a regular printer you would buy off the shelf. It’s still bad of course, but only so many people even could be impacted by it.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemm.ee 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Except you don't need to have bought one to be affected by it. Maybe your employer bought one, and infected a computer you use at work.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 days ago

That’s possible, but they aren’t really typical office printers either, it’s for specialized art printing. Again it’s definitely bad, this just isn’t typical office equipment.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's almost worse. Because then you'll be more inclined to trust them.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I would expect a printer I paid 6k for to not have malware!

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I'd have guessed HP

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] ouch@lemmy.world 145 points 4 days ago

Can you please add the company name in the title? If you want to keep original title, you can do it like this:

This printer company [Procolored]

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 93 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 27 points 4 days ago

In that case it wouldn’t be news.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 days ago

Btw, germany has a law about "Computersabotage". Wondering why HP & co still can make your paid (computer) hardware not working anymore?

Good to see there are still viruses in the wild, I was beginning to think those kinda became some ancient forgotten form of art. [I mean proper viruses, not malware in general]

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fact they're still trying to blame "Chinese language" after presumably being provided with receipts?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think they meant they were using malware detection tools that would often flag it because of the Chinese language issue and just assumed that's what was up when it flagged it this time.

Kinda like the boy who cried wolf, they ignored it when there really was a wolf.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're telling me there are malware detection tools that hit on the Chinese language? Like anything from China is malicious?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I'm just saying that's how I interpreted that bit. They thought it was a false positive because of that. For all I know, the earlier ones might have also been real malware or maybe it was all made up.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Looks like the printer company did not have antivirus on their systems.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

It was a false positive.

Edit: I can't believe this needed a /s

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No this is an example where sarcasm and stupidity can't be distinguished via text alone.

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No, it’s obvious to anyone with a brain. If the commenter seriously thought it might have been a false positive when they read the original comment, they never would have relayed their thought the way they did in their reply, and it is so clearly a reference to the content of the post that to analyze it even that deeply is overkill. To anyone reading this who is a native English speaker: if you think that comment needs a “/s”, you need to work on your reading comprehension. Read things more carefully.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Would have thought it was an obvious play on the headline, but I accept that sheer stupidity does exist.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago

Yeah unfortunately

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why would anyone use the software? Aren't modern printers plug and play?

[–] Chewget@lemm.ee 21 points 4 days ago

Plug and auto install drivers and play

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

This is not a typical home or office printer, very specialized.