this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
165 points (93.7% liked)

Technology

70980 readers
3649 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right, so I'm just supposed to trust a robot called face hugger.

[–] ravenaspiring@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Hugging face is repository and Machine learning hub. https://huggingface.co/huggingface

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 5 points 6 days ago

Some other things too.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugging_Face

See services and technologies

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I dont really understand their business model.

Hosting these huge model files. Why cant facebook/goog/m$ just do that on their own?

How did these massive ai giants end up relying on huggingface for everything?

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Collaboration. Industry leaders, universities, and hobbbiests can all collaborate in the same place rather then siloing to their own infrastructure

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but why do meta/goog/MS need to be there? Are they opening up research to each other?

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

For sure they are! Meta more then the others though

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Well you see. AI companies are run by idiots with too much money to throw around so all you have to do is tell them your startup is github for ai models and they'll bury you with money.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Until it can start doing actually work around the house. Then I'll hard pass all day. These things are useless in current state.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can it empty my dishwasher?

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you program it. Seems like Robots are now the mid 70's home computers.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll program it to do middle out algorithm

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You need it to jerk off an entire conference of software developers in record time?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

While intelligently taking into account D2F of course

[–] MajesticTechie@feddit.uk 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

How long before it becomes a sexbot?

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago

It's open source apparently, soooo fork it? Fork it real nice

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

As soon as you want it to.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

Every robot is a sexbot if you're brave enough

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m designing the 3D-printable fleshlight mount right now. Hold your horses and give me ten minutes…

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 5 points 6 days ago

It's been a day, my horse is getting impatient

[–] pogmommy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

It already is one if you're not a coward

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

I really don't, but thanks for asking I guess.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

the future is gonna be fucking insane

[–] leftover@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

The stand will be house keeping. Not happening unless it does my dishes and laundry.

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Robot is as surprised as I am!

[–] LongboardingLad@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

No I do not want that.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why these robots never get a cool appearance? I'm not talking full-body, streamlined, Ultron-like, but in actual commercial models even the face alone seems to be an easy task for movie designers and impossible for industry ones.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

George Lucas would start suing

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Design for movies only have to look good for a few minutes of close-up, and there are many tricks for making them look better in those few minutes.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Few minutes? Some have entire movies, but still look better than commercial bots like "Pepper", for example.

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A few minutes of close-up. Otherwise, medium to far shots, shots where the camera is moving enough that a few blemishes in the robot won't show up, or the focus is on another character in the shot.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 5 days ago

"Entire movies" "A few minutes of close ups" "Talking about design" "medium to far shots so blemishes won't show" If you just want to be contrarian for the sake of it, go on. I don't have time for pointless debate.

[–] Dindonmasker@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can't wait to get a remote controlled robot i can control in VR from anywhere. I just hope nobody will be able to connect to it and kill me in my sleep tho lol

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

I saw that documentary with the waxy Bruce Willis.