this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
578 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

70980 readers
3561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 14 hours ago

As a pedestrian this would be huge and make me feel so much safer.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

‘Here’s an idea: let all those around you know your status.’

‘Revolutionary!’

It’s weird we haven’t already done this, but good.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

My status is in a relationship

Don't get any ideas buddy

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

How do I set my car's status to "It's complicated"?

[–] JustAThought@lemm.ee 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Definitely make it easier for people on crosswalks to start walking. Knowing that they are slowing down.

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

In order to be most effective it would need to be dynamic rather than a fixed on/off like rear brake lights. Stopping doesn't mean stopped. So perhaps a progressive light bar that starts lighting up at 20mph and adds a light for each 5mph drop until the whole bar is lit indicating a full stop. That would give pedestrians a sense of rate of deceleration.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How about reducing the brightness of headlights so I don't feel like the sun is driving at me at night?

Also, if the car is in drive the headlights should go into auto mode. Always see people driving with just parking lights on at sundown.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes.. WHY DO CARS STILL HAVE 2 SETTINGS LIKE ITS 1935. it would take basically zero effort to have low, high, stun for headlights so the rest of us who drive normal appropriate cars don't have to be blinded by selfish assholes driving a massive truck alone by themselves that they never used for work once in their lives. Yes, im a car person and despise truck posers.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There are now headlights that can be "high" but block out portions of the beam directed at light sources like oncoming headlights. Can't have them in the US though.

[–] Hagdos@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Also known as the "fuck everyone not in a car"-setting

[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 10 points 20 hours ago

You say this like those same people won't leave it on stun

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 7 points 22 hours ago

Higher up and brighter lights=driver can see more and feels safer. Yes, even if shadows and the area immediately arounds the car are less visible and the vehicle becomes more dangerous for everyone around you.

[–] cotlovan@lemm.ee 72 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Maybe redo the driving test like... At least every 20 years? There are people on the roads who got their licenses when their town didn't even had traffic lights. People who never saw a roundabout in their first 20 years of driving.

Its nice that we restrict young people by making them take more and more driving lessons and paying more for tiered licences, like we do in Europe for motorcycles and trucks.

But maybe also take a look at the 70+ year old grandpa who had two strokes and one heart attack, has two pairs of of glasses but his license says that he's perfectly fit.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

At least give them some new info like now it's legal to go the wrong way on a bike if the speed limit is 30 km/h where I live. Guess not a lot of people know about that and a gazillion other things.

IMO, the big problem is just a matter of standards and practicality. The bar for a DL is "can operate a vehicle" and not "can safely drive a vehicle in public for extended periods of time." I agree with periodic re-licensing though; everything else called a "license" seems to need that for a host of reasons.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Sometimes you see those videos from a dash cam of a truck that hits a bridge, obviously the truck driver was been being inattentive but often so was the recording cars driver. All I can ever think is, "why were you so close behind, it was blindingly obvious that was about to happen", yet to them apparently it wasn't, and now they've got bits of truck roof in their windscreen.

There was an astounding number of people who really cannot drive, and yet they think they're driving safely. They just haven't gotten a crash yet.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I was having a very hard time seeing any possible benefit of a front brake light, since nobody accident prone ever looks in their mirrors.

I suppose in today's world of automatic transmissions that move the car forward whenever the brakes are released, they might serve some purpose at a four-way stop adding information about immediate intent of the other parties, but even there... that's more of a Darwinian situation where people who get into crashes at four way stops are sorting themselves out from the rest of reasonably competent drivers. If they're going fast enough for injuries at a four way stop, they deserve what they get. If they get a minor fender bender - that's a lesson to read the other traffic better next time.

I can't trust a car even with its turn signal on unless I see it actually slow down because I see them misused too often. The lack of signalling though is the biggest problem. People who suddenly change lanes right in front of you without warning are the worst. Then you have people who force you to wait because they can't be bothered to indicate if they are turning or going straight at intersections.

Also, don't start signaling as you are turning. I see you turning so you are just indicating what I'm already seeing. Signal before you turn.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (8 children)

Id love then to know when someone is slowing down to turn when I'm trying to pull out. So few use turn signals, and even those I don't really trust until the car is noticably getting slower.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Turn signal or not, you shouldn't be pulling out in front of them. You should be assuming they are turning into a driveway after the intersection, or that they mistook your intersection for the next one down the road, or that they left their turn signal on from a lane change 5 miles back.

Turn signals are lies until conclusively proven otherwise.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zip2@feddit.uk 20 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Wouldn’t better driving education and testing work just as well, if not better?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

as with a lot of tests, the thing a driving test is the best at measuring is how well you can take a driving test.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›