this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
102 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

72356 readers
3131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

FOIA.

The Justice Department is advancing a radical theory of presidential power, nullifying Congress’s foreign affairs powers whenever the president finds them inconvenient.

These letters provide a legal rationale (if it can be called that) for the Trump administration’s commitment not to enforce the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACAA), the divestment-or-ban law that the Supreme Court upheld in January. The letters make two central claims, both of which are astonishing in their breadth and implications for executive power.

  • Akamai Technologies
  • Amazon
  • Apple Inc.
  • Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
  • Fastly, Inc.
  • Google, Inc.
  • LG Electronics USA, Inc.
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Oracle Corporation
  • T-Mobile US, Inc.
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ELI5 please, went over my head as I am not following this issue.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Several years ago at this point, Congress passed a bill, and that bill was signed into law by the President. What that law says, is that TikTok cannot continue under Chinese ownership. Byte Dance either have to sell the American video app business so that it is controlled by Americans, or they have to shutdown Tiktok.

Byte Dance did not sell the business, so under the law TikTok has to shutdown. This law was lawyered all the way to the supreme court, and the court said it's a valid law, and must be followed.

Despite all of these facts, the law is not actually being followed. And Tiktok is still operating in the United States. There is no legally valid reason for it to do so. President Trump has issued extension after extension, even though he has no legal authority to do so.

The latest here is the top law enforcement officer in the US telling the app stores, "yes we know it's illegal to keep Tiktok in your app store, but I am pinky promising we won't go after you."

[–] rhvg@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Chinese just sent TikTok to America and showed all Americans that their rule-of-law is actually bullshit.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, I mean that was proven in the prohibition era. Alcohol was illegal, and thus you could be arrested for having it.

And yet, the task force to enforce these rules was like 1 agent per every 500,000 citizens. So "super secret" speakeasies were EVERYWHERE in those days. So common that drunks would knock on random peoples doors, and home owners would instinctively yell "THIS ISN'T A SPEAKEASY!!!" and the drunk would go knock on the next door. It was said you only had to knock on 20-30 doors depending on the city, before you happened upon a secret speakeasy.

The head of the task force said New Orleans was the easiest to find alcohol, having just flown into the airport, he said it took about 30 seconds before he got into a cab, and was IMMEDIATELY offered booze.

If a law is a law, but it's not being enforced, is it really a law?

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There was a lot about this in Boardwalk Empire. I ain't too learned but I think the creators were trying to be somewhat accurate

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm confused as to why T-Mobile is on that list but neither AT&T nor Verizon are.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 2 points 18 hours ago

It can be hard to guess who to bribe, or how big each bribe should be?