this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
409 points (95.1% liked)

Games

41040 readers
2725 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apologies for YouTuber link - as some of the sources cited are in Japanese, it’s harder to get to a direct English source. The video description includes links to the Yahoo.jp article.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You don't fuck the Japanese dating sim industry. Almost all the stuff Visa and Mastercard has gotten banned over the last decade has been Japanese.

[–] Trihilis@ani.social 90 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Im amazed it took this long. We should start banning companies like visa and MasterCard. They should be completely neutral and not try to push USA conservative christian bullshit.

[–] _cryptagion@quokk.au 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In this case, it's Australian conservative Christian bullshit, but no doubt they have many supporters in the US as well, since this is every Evangelicals wet dream.

Religion needs to fuck right off and stop harassing people.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Australian one is associated with the American movement all the way down. Might as well had come from America.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, we just both have the same parent.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

And we’re equally disappointed in both of you for following our terrible example.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 125 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

You can't put the article link instead of the generic yahoo.jp? Are you trying to get views or something?

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/b68ac34e65ec99559eb024ed91df59b696d40eed

Administrative sanction on VISA for suspected violation of antitrust law The Public Commission applies the affirmative procedure

On the 22nd, the Japan Fair Trade Commission applied the administrative and affirmative procedures of Visa, an international credit card brand, as a suspected violation of the Antitrust Act (unfair trading method) regarding the terms of business with its partners, with regard to the terms and conditions of transactions with partners. According to the commission, it is the first administrative disposition on a credit card international brand, including the largest in the industry and the largest share (market share) in the country.

[Figure] In 2024, the Public Commission will inspect the VISA Japan corporation

 In July 2024, the Public Commission conducted an on-site inspection of a Japanese subsidiary of a visa on suspicion of violating the Antitrust Act. We were also investigating overseas related sites such as U.S. headquarters.

 The affirmation procedure is one of the administrative measures that aims to resolve the problem at an early stage by agreement between the Public Commission and the business operator. This month, the Visa submitted a voluntary improvement plan that “commits” the resolution of suspected illegality and reporting the status of its implementation under the supervision of a third party for five years, and the commission recognized it as effective in preventing recurrence.

 In line with this, the Public Commission did not recognize the violation of the Antitrust Act of the visa, and postponed more enforceable administrative measures such as exclusion measures orders and surcharge payment orders. Yutaka Yamada

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 53 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Thanks. There's no way I'm clicking a Youtube link to read an article.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I only linked to the YouTuber summary because the article was in Japanese. Certainly it’s the better source if you can read it.

[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There’s no karma here. No automated mechanism gives the submitter any benefit for a popular submission.

Right?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm talking about having us visit the youtube video just to get the article link, while having no information on what's being discussed or new developments in the post body.

A youtube link alone is essentially just click bait. This kind of comes off as a youtuber trying to bring up his views and not a lemming trying to start a discussion.

[–] mspencer712@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

Ok yeah that makes sense. Thanks.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like this has nothing to do with recent events?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The article is a bit confusing, only the first paragraph is relevant I think. It seems like 22nd refers to last Tuesday and then the article jumps to events that happened a year ago. It might be the translation, I'm just using the built in Firefox one.

In any case, it is the link in the video description.

[–] simple@piefed.social 43 points 2 days ago

According to articles I can find, this has nothing to do with recent censorships?

https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/25/07/46593164/visa-hit-by-japans-first-ever-antitrust-action-against-credit-card-industry

Japan’s Fair Trade Commission has taken its first administrative action against the credit card industry, targeting Visa Worldwide Pte Ltd., a subsidiary of Visa Inc.‘s Singapore operations, over suspected monopolistic practices in the authorization system market.

[...]

The investigation centered on Visa’s November 2021 terms changes that rendered credit card companies managing merchant outlets ineligible for commission discounts in certain industries unless they adopted Visa’s authorization system.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hepl yes, based japan, defenders of freedom?

That felt totally normal to say.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How is Japan anti-censorship? What a time to be alive

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

japan exists in a superstate of being pro censorship and anti censorship

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is a country that has porn mags being sold in convenience stores and plenty of stores where you can find content for all sorts of fetishes both online and offline. They also have 2 huge indie artist markets every year where at least 50% of the content being sold is porn. Each event gets about 300k people. Only thing I can think of regarding censorship here are the mosaics and those are only really there due to a very old law that no lawmakers are gonna bother with expending political capital to reverse.

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seriously. I was so surpeiced when I learned that porn in Japan is serialized and you only need to know the serial number of a porn to find the exact one piece you are looking for.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Porn is serious business man

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's the indie artist market called?

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think they are. Protectionist and interested in their exports, seem more likely.

[–] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

While this is probably true. I don't think it's a stretch to say countries like Japan and South Korea are probably better at democracy than the "west" atp

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let's maybe not include a straight up oligarchy corpo state like south korea in that statement. Better than the usa? Maybe, but they'd even give that a run for the money, and just barely win out.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

Japan isn’t much better for oligarchy.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

defenders of freedom?

We're going through a bit of a far-right thing at the moment, so you may want to hold off on that assessment.

Aren't we all?

And like i said; felt like a totally normal thing to say.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

Kick their ass Japan! Don't go easy on them, make them stop their bullshit INTERNATIONALLY if they want their sanctions removed!

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The video makes mention of a change.org petition calling on Visa, Mastercard and the like to ignore that sect trying to create moral outrage. I know Change.org petitions are pretty worthless, but this one already has over 100k signatures: https://www.change.org/p/tell-mastercard-visa-activist-groups-stop-controlling-what-we-can-watch-read-or-play/

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

To this day, I don't understand why Visa or MasterCard (or even a "physical" or even virtual card) are necessary. If the banks can't create a global, shared way of processing payments, then the governments should step in and do it for them.

[–] toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl 26 points 2 days ago

I imagine that's because that would be against the interests of the owners of those companies. Which presumably have some power in the world, being practically internationally successful banks.

Tldr; money.

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Generally the world has that. There's SWIFT and EPI in Europe, EPAA in Asia and Pix is South America. The biggest credit card market is North America.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm in Europe, and my debit card says visa. That's the part that confuses me...

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

Mine too, but it's not a visa card. Just compatible with visa terminals. Mine also says cirrus, maestro and a few other payment systems.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

it was barely thirty years ago when small businesses didnt always accept every credit card. i remember one time as a kid i used my little bank card at a gift shop and the lady used that ancient scrubby thing to mark that weird multilayer receipt paper

[–] Agent_Karyo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This reads like a joke. :)

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Payment processors setting up an economy where they control what you can and can't pay for, so funny, good joke

[–] elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You're going to start mailing cash to Valve with a little note listing your Steam account and what games you want?

[–] elvis_depresley@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For starters, you can buy a steam gift card with cash. Then buy whatever you like with the card.

But i actually meant it more broadly, you can also use cash for other transactions where you are physically present.

I dislike how much power visa and mastercard have gotten, and cash is probably the best alternative for offline private transactions.

Any gift card still needs to be processed by a processor, who could get all up in arms just like MasterCard and Visa.

I mentioned digital transactions because that's what has been restricted in essentially all cases. They don't seem to care if you buy porn in person, they just don't want you buying porn online.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Works for something like PSN. I see cards for sale in local shops. They can presumably be used to claim some funny money in the service that you can pay with.

Steam could probably do the same, but would suck for a smaller operation.

There used to be some cash to BTC machines that would work with any service.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

Steam literally already does sell those.

A gift card isn't cash, legally or literally. Gift cards also require processors. So this could happen again with gift cards, just with a different set of processing companies.

So what's your answer? Cheques, money orders, cash in the mail? Or maybe MasterCard, Visa, and their ilk shouldn't legally be allowed to limit legal purchases that haven't been flagged as fraud.

load more comments
view more: next ›