this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
345 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

73503 readers
3337 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

How many red flags do you need to collect before you get a free cat?

[–] atk007@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why did the app had the government IDs and credit card data to begin with? The app looks like an obvious phishing scam/ Honeypot situation.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

that's a great(terrible) idea for a sex trafficking psyop. just get yourself a female spokesperson and make it a platform that gives a voice to women who have survived abuse. they'll willingly give you all their information on where to find them and their psych profiles on how to manipulate them.

fucked up, but really shows how fucked up apps are in general and how much power we give to them over ourselves.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 126 points 4 days ago (19 children)

Tea was storing its users’ sensitive information on Firebase, a Google-owned backend cloud storage and computing service.

Every time. With startups, it's always an unsecured Firebase or S3 bucket.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Bubbey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

A more ironic outcome couldn't have happened

[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 72 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Honestly it seems like a weapon that can too easily be used for defamation

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

How dare you!
The misogyny!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I feel that the app filled a need of women we should not ignore. But the app, both this specific app and also the overall concept, is just too rife with downsides to be workable.

So we, as men and as society need to reevaluate why women feel the need for such an app, and reinvest in the criminal justice system to hold victimizers more accountable.

It’s okay to call this app and similar Facebook groups unacceptable. But that’s not enough, we must also call for stronger protections for victims of criminal behavior.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Velypso@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ah nice.

Time to implement a social score. Those who rate highly have better access to social areas.

Those who rate lower are fucked for the rest of their life.

This sounds like such an amazing idea that has no shortcomings whatsoever!

Edit: /s

[–] Bort@hilariouschaos.com 67 points 4 days ago

Tea wasn’t hacked. Tea posted these images to a public file sharing site. Tea claimed that they deleted these images after verifying the applicant was a woman but clearly that was a fraudulent claim.

[–] danny801@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

S2 Underground has a great video about this. It's basically a spy app with national security implications.

People using their military IDs for account verification and location data found in their pictures lays the argument that this data could be used for blackmail.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think of the "bad" dates I would want to be able to warn other women of that didn't rise to the level of calling the cops. The guy who ordered triple the food and drinks I did and skipped out on the bill. The guy who flat out lied about multiple things and then got irate when I politely excused myself from the date. The MAGA weirdo who went on an unhinged rant about how I needed to submit to him because God said so. I imagine some men have comparable experiences with some anti-social women. The experiences coming to mind were not illegal, but were absolutely things I want to spare my fellow humans from.

I would prefer the dating apps themselves have some mechanism for disincentivizing anti-social behaviors. It would have to be more than a simple 5-star rating.

I wonder how it would work IRL to offer the ability to write a few sentences in response to prompts about a date. The written review is not published as-is, but is used in grouping of many reviews to give a summary about a person. Like the summary product reviews on Amazon now. "Bill's dates found he was prompt and polite. Some dates expressed discomfort at some of his political views" and "Bob's dates warn he is often late and is quick to use foul language to describe women. Multiple dates report no intention to communicate with Bob further". "Ben's dates report he has skipped out on the bill repeatedly, and sends unsolicited dick pics. Multiple dates have blocked him".

The group summary gives a buffer so the person reviewed doesn't know which specific date said what. And ensures the summary doesn't include negative comments about a person unless multiple dates of theirs independently report similar experiences.

Of course a bad actor could ditch their dating profile and start fresh any time they build up enough negative reviews to make their summary look bad. And of course the reviews and the summaries would have to be secured tighter than "Tea" is.

load more comments (1 replies)

Sounds MAGA level IT and dev.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 32 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Change the target to any other group and the outrage would be 100-10000 fold bigger.

Try it out, instead of Women rating men, try subbing in various minority groups or races.

Bonus points for the most offensive combinations.....

e.g. Russians rating Ukrainians in your area....it can get pretty bad...I can think of many worse combos.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 38 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I think the key reason this was seen as not being terribly offensive was the fact that women are disproportionately more likely than men to be on the receiving end of tons of different negative consequences when dating, thus to a degree justifying them having more of a safe space where their comfort and safety is prioritized.

1

However I think a lot of people are also recognizing now that such an app has lots of downsides that come as a result of that kind of structure, like false allegations being given too much legitimacy, high amounts of sensitive data storage, negative interactions being blown out of proportion, etc. I also think that this is yet another signature case of "private market solution to systemic problem" that only kind of addresses the symptoms, but not the actual causes of these issues that are rooted more in our societal standards and expectations of the genders, upbringing, depictions in media, etc.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How does this app even work?

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 122 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You sign up and then a while later, your personal information gets leaked to the public. Not sure what its other purpose is.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 4 days ago (14 children)

That's corporate social media/apps in general. Does this thing basically let people list crappy things that happened to them by specific humans?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 47 points 4 days ago (18 children)

It's basically a slander app, from what I can tell.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›