this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
576 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

73503 readers
5443 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung has decided to proceed with the Bootloader blocking also in Europe, a move that has caused a lot of discussion. Behind this choice is a European regulation that will come into force in August 2025 and which risks changing smartphone usage in Europe forever. This is why other manufacturers may soon follow suit.

From 1 August 2025, new provisions will come into force RED Directive (Radio Equipment Directive), which redefines the compliance requirements for all radio devices sold in Europe. This is a significant change, not so much for the amount of regulations introduced, but for the effect they will have on the entire Android ecosystem. The issue revolves around three articles that impose specific protections: against network interference, personal data compromise, and digital fraud. These are, in themselves, sacrosanct rules.

But the crux comes with the interpretation prevailingEach device must ensure full compliance not only with the hardware, but also with the software that controls the radio modules. This is where the bootloader comes in. Unlocking it essentially allows you to replace the original operating system with an alternative one, such as LineageOS or GrapheneOS.

But these systems, if they modify the radio drivers even minimally, invalidate the CE certification. An uncertified device can no longer be legally marketed or used, at least according to the most stringent reading of the law.

This scenario has therefore led Samsung to protect its devices. Not on a whim, but to avoid any software modifications falling under your legal liability. If a user installs a ROM that interferes with radio frequencies or compromises communications security, the manufacturer (and in some cases the importer) may be held directly liable.

RED does not explicitly talk about unlocking the Bootloader or custom ROM, but it opens one regulatory space in which the margins for maneuver are they narrow. And in doing so, it provides a solid argument for those who have been trying for years to close the loop between hardware, software, and services. After all, customizing the operating system also means breaking away from proprietary services and, therefore, from the model that ties the user to the brand.

Samsung is just the first to move, but it's hard to imagine it will be the only one. Starting in August 2025, it's very likely that other manufacturers will follow suit, at least for the European market.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 10 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

Good luck applying this sorta lockdown to PCs.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 193 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck smart phones and neo feudalism. This is theft of ownership with a criminal complicit government. I applaud all Luigi's these people deserve it. These are the killers of democracy. If your device only runs factory filtered stalkerware garbage, all democracy is dead. All information is easily filtered by this proprietary shit. Freedom of the press is a bullshit tiny niche of the broader requirement for a fully informed public. The fucking "press" is bullshit to highlight. You must have fully informed citizens and you may not choose how that information is shared or disseminated between citizens. This is not democracy. People are so fucking stupid.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Notice how the article implies Samsung and other corporations don't want to do this, even though it's something they've wanted to do for a long time? They almost certainly lobbied and ghost wrote most of this legislation to begin with; now they play the victim, even though they're a perpetrator.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Notice how the article implies Samsung and other corporations don’t want to do this, even though it’s something they’ve wanted to do for a long time?

It's already disproportionately difficult to just root a Samsung phone, so this change perfectly fits the pattern. (Posting this from a new Samsung phone that I'm desperately trying to root.)

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 4 points 21 hours ago

I just don't buy android anymore. It sucks. Apple you always sucked too. Annoyingly society kinda requires me to have a phone so I will just get what ever someone else is throwing away or is very cheap second hand.

Reject their devices is the only real choice you can make. Don't give them money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Oh. I better make no mistake and update to Oneui 8 when it comes in my phone.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wait - is this about all radio devices or only mobile connectivity ones?

I.e., is WiFi affected as well? Or does it only affect internet that you access through your carrier?

The article says:

From 1 August 2025, new provisions will come into force RED Directive (Radio Equipment Directive), which redefines the compliance requirements for all radio devices sold in Europe.

Which technically would also affect WiFi.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 111 points 1 day ago

If you don't control the device, you don't own the device.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

So what? Linux computers are not compliant, can not use wifi, or what? I don't see how that prevents unlockable bootloaders, other than being used as an excuse by the manufacturers.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any device that transmits radio frequencies wont be able to be sold in the EU.

The only way a manufacturer can be sure that won't happen is to create their hardware such that it isn't usable unless it can be sure its in an environment which won't do that.

Currently, that would mean a machine running Secure Boot and Windows 11 using driver signing.

Linux wouldn't be able to fake the verification to the hardware, due to not having the keys, and so could not create drivers for any hardware designed this way.

[–] FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hold up so theyre banning flippers and portapacks etc?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

IIRC they're already doing this in China. I got hold of a chinese phone a while ago, and there was no way to install your own OS on it, you just had to use what came pre-installed, and i don't know how much state-sponsored surveillance was on that.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wait, what does that mean for USB LTE devices? Devices that you can attack to a desktop computer to give you mobile internet. Last time i checked, they're widely available.

Would these become illegal as well?

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 99 points 1 day ago (5 children)

An uncertified device can no longer be ... used

Oh, fuck. Call the French, they have the most active civil society that actually can burn a thing or two during a week or two. That is the craziest law ever, denying the most basic human rights! That is literally a prohibition of DIY of any kind.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

It feels like a generation from now, doing what was common in the US during the creation of Apple and Microsoft will be considered terrorism.

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You connect a wire to a battery and you just created an illegal transmitter!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LeTak@feddit.org 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This was the only reason I liked Android over iOS: the CFW community. I’ve been running some sort of CFW since Android 4.0. Now, the charm has gone. GrapheneOS, SailfishOS, e/OS, LineageOS, iode OS, and even CyanogenMod – I’ve used them all. Each one has its own target group and use case. I hope it turns into the better one again. It’s like forcing a PC to only run the OS it’s delivered with.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s like forcing a PC to only run the OS it’s delivered with.

That's coming. Everything else has been locked down.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 30 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I'm also convinced that we'll be herded ever more toward cloud computing. That is, we'll all have our "desktop" on the cloud and thin clients to access it.

Don't get me started on the dystopia I see coming from that.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 48 points 1 day ago

In terms of the radio rules. The radio has always had its own firmware on android phones. The rules could be implemented using hardware fuses and restrictions on signed firmware updates for those specific systems.

That is they make the "single model for the world" as is generally economically the best option in many cases. And before shipping to distributors it's stamped with the region and the fuses for that region are blown. Now it doesn't mean it cannot be used elsewhere. But it means that it will follow all rules for the certification stamped on the device.

That would mean that any firmware for the main operating system cannot command it to do anything outside of the limits defined by those rules. So it's not really a technical reason not to allow custom bootloaders.

But of course, probably the manufacturers generally don't want you to be able to remove their firmware that is often filled with sponsored required app installs. So this is a convenient way to pretend their hands are tied.

Not a coincidence that this comes I to existence just after TPM requirements. They want to lock everyone into using only government approved software. The death of freedom and liberty.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This sounds like bullshit.

An uncertified device can no longer be legally marketed or used

Ok, but I'm not marketing my LineageOS phone and I don't believe Samsung can be responsible for me using it. It sounds like phones with custom ROM will simply lose CE certification (unless the custom ROM is itself certified). Samsung obtains the CE certification and sells certified phone. Making them responsible for anything that happens after that (besides regular updates) is something completely different than what this article talks about. It would basically mean that Samsung has to make sure that their devices cannot be hacked/rooted but ensuring security of hardware and software is something completely different and is covered by different laws. Even the RAD website clearly says this:

"In 2021, the Commission decided to pause the initiative following the announcement of the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), due to potential overlaps. In 2023, it was agreed that cybersecurity requirements would transfer from the Radio Equipment Directive (RED) to the CRA."

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›