this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
121 points (96.9% liked)

Linux

56960 readers
472 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 71 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I feel like these headlines are designed to be way scarier than the scenarios actually are to people that don't know much about Arch Linux.

[–] fouc@feddit.uk 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think it's a good thing to frighten users just a little bit. Arch is no longer a niche distro and it was only a matter of time before someone took advantage of the generally unvetted AUR. It's a wake-up call that the times of good faith are gone and you need to pay attention.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 6 points 2 days ago

Just tell them to read the arch wiki page on AUR and take it seriously, IMO

[–] Euphoma@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

Instead of someone accidentally ruining your pc, they intentionally ruin your pc!

[–] scintilla@beehaw.org 9 points 2 days ago

Seriously. It's technically true that there was a RAT on the AUR but the way it's titled is written to intentionally invoke times where it was more than one thing.

[–] gazby@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Just standard clickbait, but sounds more serious because we understand the extent to which they're going out of their way to bend and withhold the facts.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 days ago

true and part of me suspects that it's intentional on the part of arch users so that they can continue to tell the world that they "use arch btw" lol

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

Man, we're gonna have to change the name of the AUR because bad journalists keep thinking this has something to do with the distro.

"Arch Linux Users who go out of their way to install RAT at risk of installing RAT"

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 51 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The malicious packages were found and removed quite quickly. Also anyone who doesn't blindly install from the AUR would have seen a suspicious .lol url. I suppose that a genuine package using a .lol url isn't impossible, it's just very unlikely,

These attacks do demonstrate the strength and weakness of the AUR, that anyone can upload anything at any time. The same as flathub and the snap store. Treat all of them with appropriate caution.

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Flatpak does have a concept of Verified Publisher. Many distros ship flatpak app store with default filter set to Verified Publisher only.

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

That sounds like a nice feature we could use for the Aur actually. We already have the votes value, but some sort of verification body could help rescue the Aur's reputation.

[–] Cricket@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

Many distros ship flatpak app store with default filter set to Verified Publisher only.

Also, if your distro doesn't do this, you can do it yourself. You can modify, for instance, KDE Discover's flathub repo to use the verified subset.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is AUR more risky than before? Nope. But this targets more people than ever. StreamOS and CachyOS are pretty popular these days.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SteamOS users dont use the AUR.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I use it from a distrobox.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Using the arch distro right?

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, was using vanilla arch before my desktop stopped working. My deck with a dock works, but discover was inadequate.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah but thats not really steamOS using the aur.

SteamOS using the aur would be unlocking the root folder, doing a pacman update and then using the AUR which I assume very very few users do.

I only mention this because everytime arch is mentioned steamOS gets dragged up as if its the same thing when they're worlds apart.

Using the AUR via distrobox can be done on every distro.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 hours ago

Yes but thats not relevant. Its like me saying windows users dont use the AUR and then you saying um actually im on windows and I run arch in a VM and use the AUR. Like ok thats still the AUR being used on arch.

Like the topic is AUR malware and someone was like arch users and steamOS users. But steamOS users dont need to be worried or lumped in because they aren't using the aur unless they're also using arch through vm or distrobox or whatever.

Am I making sense?

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

This is the most likely reason why all of sudden there is an uptick in attempt to embed malware in AUR build scripts.

[–] mactan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

I saw two pkgbuild from the user, I don't really know what I'm looking at in pkgbuilds generally but these were dead obvious something was bogus . downloading arbitrary files from some url like (segs)(dot)(lol) hopefully sufficiently defanged

[–] h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago

Installing from AUR without reviewing the PKGBUILD is a self pwn.

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Me, a hacker, targeting anyone who says they use Arch btw.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

isnt that well known though? AUR packages are built by third parties (eg users) and there were always warnings against just this, no?

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 1 points 15 hours ago

The problem is Arch doesnt package everything

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It is a well known risk but not something that was a real risk numerically. I mean, it still isn’t given the number of packages in the AUR.

This is a couple of malicious packages discovered in a short period though. Not a good sign. It was really impact the AUR if polluting it with malware became common.

You should always inspect AUR packages before installing them but few people do. Many would not even know what they were looking at.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

yeah, that's almost as bad as those apps requiring you to pipe a remote script through sudo shell

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

God I hate those. The worst way to distribute apps.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

especially when flatpaks exist now!

[–] mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online 1 points 2 days ago

This is why I just use the Chaotic AUR, knowing that something like this was being posted everywhere. My producer, Neigsendoig, does the exact same with his machine.

We both use CachyOS anyway.