this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
246 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

73734 readers
4131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Because the port and the associated internal hardware would take up a huge amount of space.

It's not much space to a smartphone, but to a device the size of a watch, the USB-C port would end up being the largest internal component.

Wireless charging is the answer for most watches, though it means cases can't be all metal and glass.

[–] aion@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I assume you mean having a USB-C port on the side of the watch. Having that port would allow water to get in to the case, the cradle-style charges used by smart watches allow the case to be sealed to prevent water damage. Even if you are careful about not wearing the watch when bathing, or in the rain, or in a pool, its unlikely you remove you watch every time you wash your hands or wash dishes.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The article goes into this.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the better question is, why can't wireless charging be more universal. We had decades of 500 different competing phone chargers. (as the famous XKCD comic https://xkcd.com/927/ ) mocks.

yet we don't seem to be getting anywhere near the idea of a universal wireless charge system.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I mean, we are for phones. Qi2 is finally becoming more widespread, and the Qi1/Magsafe spec is quietly more compatible than its official support suggests.

Why this doesn't extend to watches and only partially to earbuds is a different question, but I at least the most likely devices to have wireless charging are getting there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Nice that watches ranging from £16 to £200 already support USB-C. My two Garmin watches both have (incompatible) unique charging/data ports.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.earth 8 points 2 days ago

My ~~spoon~~ USB-C port is too big

eta: JFC, who wrote this?

Here is a modern smartwatch with USB C

Picture of a fucking brick with straps

Seriously, none of those "examples" are anything I would consider wearing, and I have clubs for hands

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago

This is very dumb.

Now, if it was annoyed by magnetic pogo connectors not being standard we could talk. Wireless for watches, too.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SoulKaribou@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

64 times the power but I can't read Braille (ungh)

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Don't watches use pads to recharge with a usbc? My samsung did.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›