this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
630 points (83.8% liked)

Technology

73734 readers
4334 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toast@retrolemmy.com 25 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Nothing wrong with being a Luddite

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

It was always about worker's rights anyways:

Malcolm L. Thomas argued in his 1970 history The Luddites that machine-breaking was one of the very few tactics that workers could use to increase pressure on employers, undermine lower-paid competing workers, and create solidarity among workers. "These attacks on machines did not imply any necessary hostility to machinery as such; machinery was just a conveniently exposed target against which an attack could be made."[10] Historian Eric Hobsbawm has called their machine wrecking "collective bargaining by riot", which had been a tactic used in Britain since the Restoration because manufactories were scattered throughout the country, and that made it impractical to hold large-scale strikes.[13][14] An agricultural variant of Luddism occurred during the widespread Swing Riots of 1830 in southern and eastern England, centring on breaking threshing machines.[15]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

It was about making sure that as mechanization resulted in a lower need for labor, that workers compensation remained steady, and they worked less hours.

People hating luddites is just the result of centuries old propaganda from the wealthy

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago

Come on Guardian... why frame it like that? Folks using AI should be called out as strange.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Count me in

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

There it is. The stupidest headline I've read all week.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 14 points 1 day ago

What a terrible choice of words. They’re immediately assigning political placement and party to the idea of avoiding AI use instead of appealing to all of humanity on this topic.

Plus, it’s a silly metaphor.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Terrible choice of words, veganism deserves better than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago

I've never used AI, even when wanting to give it a try. There was either a queue or a fee, or must click-wrap agree to terms and conditions for free two months and I wasn't going to do those.

I never did an NFT either.

[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 hours ago

Guess i'm vegan now

[–] tino@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

TIL I'm a lot of thing vegan... also, not a vegan.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

How about we don't call that being an AI vegan and just call it a model objection. That's fucking ridiculous, that's a term designed to make not using AI for that reason look bad and preachy.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

If we go this route, there is also from for AI Crossfitters

[–] Pudutr0n@feddit.cl 11 points 1 day ago

I only eat non-sentient AIs too.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well shit, I didn't know they had a name for us. That's cool.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›