this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
659 points (84.0% liked)

Technology

73734 readers
5327 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

There it is. The stupidest headline I've read all week.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Terrible choice of words, veganism deserves better than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 14 points 1 day ago

What a terrible choice of words. They’re immediately assigning political placement and party to the idea of avoiding AI use instead of appealing to all of humanity on this topic.

Plus, it’s a silly metaphor.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Count me in

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago

I've never used AI, even when wanting to give it a try. There was either a queue or a fee, or must click-wrap agree to terms and conditions for free two months and I wasn't going to do those.

I never did an NFT either.

[–] candyman337@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

How about we don't call that being an AI vegan and just call it a model objection. That's fucking ridiculous, that's a term designed to make not using AI for that reason look bad and preachy.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pudutr0n@feddit.cl 11 points 1 day ago

I only eat non-sentient AIs too.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well shit, I didn't know they had a name for us. That's cool.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't say I'm a (normal) vegan, but I'm definitely an AI vegan. I was turned off by the ethical considerations, and the few "bites" I have tried leave a bad taste in my mouth. I avoid using it because much of the training data was (and is) stolen, the power costs are far too high compared to the utility, and it's basically worthless to me, having a screwed up response to nearly every prompt I tried.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly the same as me.

Love me a good steak, never even tried AI.

I've stood by while my colleagues have used it. I ask them a question they might know, just to check before I start spending time reading documentation. They'll go "just ask Bing!" (Company endorsed AI.)

They'll keep prompting and prompting and discussing the results, meanwhile I just go directly to the docs and find the information right there written on the screen.

I won't subject myself to the dumbification. I don't even use copilot to auto-complete as much as a for loop. I know how it's written, damnit.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

HA!

I feel like I should be annoyed at the headline, but honestly it's clever. Veganism isn't just a diet, but an ethical framework on minimizing harm so this fits all three aspects in the articles.

  • I support artists who had their work stolen as part of dataset, it's largely the same reason I don't eat animals, it's all about consent. Being harmed without consent is always wrong.

  • Likewise the environmental footprint of meat and AI are massive and unnecessary. The carbon footprint between meat and plant protein is massive, just like the difference between building more data centers and supporting existing artists.

  • AI is bad for your mental health, we don't really have complete research on what exactly AI does to our brains but I've seen enough people thinking they "unlocked sentience", became "digital gods" and started AI "relationships" to steer clear for my own protection. Not dissimilar to the studies that show a plant based diet is better for your heart and immune system. I'd still be eating plants even if it were bad for my health, I care more about the ethical side, but existing research very much shows it as a net positive.

Neat concept.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

today I was trying to find how to manipulate a trunk on an aruba switch and JFK the internet search results were fucking shit on a platter! I tried to reword it in ways that might give me a better result but it never happened. None of the commands the AI suggested would have worked.

I FUCKING HATE AI results in the web searching tools

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People who care*

[–] josefo@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

If we go this route, there is also from for AI Crossfitters

[–] piyuv@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Now we wait for article “meet genocide vegans: people who are against Israel’s genocide against Palestinians based on ethical reasons”

[–] tino@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

TIL I'm a lot of thing vegan... also, not a vegan.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›