$2.99, then $4.99, then $6.99, then $9.99, then $9.99 with commercials and $14.99 without.
Howdy ho!
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
123 points (94.2% liked)
Technology
75069 readers
2780 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Lol. Wanted to comment exactly that. Netflix drove me to piracy again after I went legit after 25yrs of piracy. Won't fall for this streaming-bullshit again. Go fuck yourself. And Netflix was even more worse for everyone outside the US. For the same price of course.
Nah, piracy never been easier: enter name of movie/series, wait a minute, watch. On all devices, rooted or not, mainstream or not.
I actually probably spend more on hardware and labour pirating content than I would on multiple streaming services, but at least I don't pad the profits of enshittified platforms, and can watch what I want when I want.
Ha, I was doing a similar calculation recently. I think the only subscription I ever paid for was Netflix, and for the others I used family and friends' accounts. Only replacing Netflix, I haven't broken even, but considering I pirate content from 5-6 different services, it's absolutely cheaper.
Yeah sure, for the price of my servers i could probably get all streaming-services together for some years :-) But they're not just for that. Jellyfin is just one of the services that runs on them. But yes, even if not. Better paying 5x for something like that than netflix et al.
Me too. They actually made stop being lazy and make a full automated server specifically for this. Netflix was awful too with the buffering.
*arr suite for the win.
It's a vastly superior experience.
I don't have to deal with annoying authentication, no ads, works on everything, all content is available in a single app/user interface.
Cheap. I split the $40/mo seedbox charge with 3 siblings, we all save on streaming.
I even have audiobookshelf because I like listening to audiobooks.
No music yet, I don't have a good (private tracker) source
Look into Usenet. Much better experience than torrents.
I've used Usenet, I can see how it would be good for music. Being able to grab individual tracks on demand would be nice.
What's the software stack used now? Manual downloading nzbs from index sites? or is there an *arr equivalent?
Lidarr is the one for music
Oh, I didn't know Lidarr supported Usenet. Hmm, thanks I'll look into it
I learned my lesson with Netflix, I'll never stop doing things the better way again.
I still will never forgive Netflix for pulling a show without warning when I was actively watching it. A problem I never get doing it my way.
And then $24.99/mo and no commercial free option ever. Plus they send you spam advertising and sell all your personal data. Cha-ching!
What I find funny about this is that often the quality of the shit on the service decreases as the price continues to rise.
To see the end state, just check out trying to stream all of the NFL games of an out of market team. It's like $1000 a year to watch mostly beer and truck ads broken up by thirty minutes of "football".
This is my default mindset now. Anytime I see a relevant "new subscription with great value!", I just...don't. Because I already know it won't last, it'll get sold or bought out, and everything good about it stripped out and scrapped.
Yarrr
$2.99 for now
ad free for now
This is step 1 of enshittification, offer a product thats cheaper and higher quality than your competition. Once they have a userbase they'll start tiering their service.
Gamepass anyone? 🤣🤣
def tryna get ppl to go well its cheaper than a debrid service
The same Roku that added mandatory ads to their home screen after selling the product and promising not to do exactly that?
Roku Channel is also ad-free with PiHole.
What ad lists are you using?
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts
- https://mirror1.malwaredomains.com/files/justdomains
- http://sysctl.org/cameleon/hosts
- https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_tracking.txt
- https://s3.amazonaws.com/lists.disconnect.me/simple_ad.txt
- https://hosts-file.net/ad_servers.txt
Thanks for sharing. I'll compare it to mine when I get a chance. I've been struggling to find good lists for my roku.
-ahh title
It's not the $3/month ad free Tubi type service that is the bad part. It is the part where it is attached to Roku. That company has proven the kind of trash they are already.
Just use pirate bay or soulseek
Roku via telstra bricked by Telstra TV box that I was using to watch mp4 channels on an older set.
Never trusting that brand again.
TPB FTW.
not that I'm going to use this service, considering roku's sleazy history of thrusting ads into anything they build, but looking at the content: eh, lots of solid b material..... but half of it has $ next to the title.
what the fuck is the point of showing you THE CATALOG if half the shit requires more money? I despise this on Amazon as well. If it's not on the service i'm already subscribed to why the fuck are you cluttering up the UI?
sure, if people want that, let them turn it on, but by default? scumfucks.
When I saw the ad for this on my Roku I thought it was just some western channel based on the name and color scheme. It wasn't until I saw an article about it that I even knew what it was. I looked into it, my thoughts are, terrible branding, terrible marketing, terrible discovery on the website.
I don't see anything that I don't already own that I would want to watch, but since the website search sucks I don't know if there's more to see or not.
Based on all that, I'm not even willing to blow $2.99 one time to see if it gets better in the app because I doubt it will.
i had no idea roku bought frndly
I'm not negative on this. Streaming apps are easy to cancel and move to something else. Roku will probably raise the price someday and when it's too high, shift off. I checked Roku originals on Wikipedia and they have barely anything significant. A small amount of feature films they have distribution rights to. TV shows, nothing original narrative seems like a hit. Then a bunch of reality shows and like cooking shows.
They're a very long way away from being able to get subscribers on the basis of their original content. Not even Sony has a general streaming service and under them are a bunch of hit TV shows and movies along with their decades of back catalog. Not planning to sub but if I'm insanely bored, I can sub for a month and find some old TV show comedy to put in the background
Jellyfin/Plex with the *Arr stack is still the better option. A little bit of setup, but then blissful ad-free self-hosted streaming.
Your point? 🤔