this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2025
635 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74292 readers
6451 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/34873574

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrgnz@feddit.org 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't know why but I feel relaxed about it. It's hardly enforceable and I don't even think Springer will win this. It's just a feeling from experience with those things in Germany.

They're also referring to browser based ad blocking which leaves blockers like pi hole or ad guard to be legal options.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I just went through the comments ... people are losing their shit. And as always whenever Germany is mentioned, Godwin's Law is in full effect.
Apparently nobody remembers the very American and very similar youtube-dl takedown which ended in youtube-dl's favor. tl;dr: website owners cannot tell people how to read their websites.

DON'T PANIC nothing has happened, and it won't for years.

(edit: slight correction)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

It should/would then also be illegal to block virus/spyware delivery, or everyone's favorite, 50 porn window pop ups. The latter was "fixed" by browsers maybe 10 years ago.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 17 points 3 days ago

I guess we shut off the fucking Internet to Germany then. 🖕🏻

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 18 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I bet Google probably lobbied to revive this somehow.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

maybe in the future a service offers a flat monthly fee to not have any ads and distributes the money to all of the content platforms that would otherwise show ads. basically it's like a little government taxing users and giving the money to the capital owning class all over again

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dzajew@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

I'm gonna modify Springer's websites so hard, they're gonna resemble a Picasso's painting

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Great, but how could they possibly enforce it? It's infeasible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

That would be totally unenforceable, imo.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Will they sue Dillo next, because it looks like this there? 👉👈🥹

Btw, they lost in this already what, 7 times?

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

With the recent insults to privacy (including E2E encryption) and the pro-corporate legislation, has Germany lost its way? Seems like newer generations are forgetting the lived experience of the Stasi. Also, I feel that pro-tenant legislation is at risk.

Update: the top comment is the best; don’t read my bullshit.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›