this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
451 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

74450 readers
3064 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] subarctictundra@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Hmmmmm, let me play devils advocate and say that kids should have access to porn.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the best way to solve this is to not have kids in the first place.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

And deprive capital of all that cheap labor? Have you no heart sir/madam?

[–] toad31@lemmy.cif.su 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If I had to guess, I'd say the government pushback against porn is a result of members of the ruling class catching their offspring with porn.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd say it has more to do with pandering to religious conservatives to keep them in their pocket.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 92 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dame Rachel de Souza told BBC Newsnight it was "absolutely a loophole that needs closing" and called for age verification on VPNs.

Saw that coming. Can’t have the populace living their lives without constant, repressive government scrutiny.

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

But it’s for the kids what kind of psychopath could be against that!!!!???

[–] bluecat_OwO@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

we could have arrived at this argument before this whole data stealing conundrum

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.ml 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (23 children)

Do the government ministers understand that setting up your own VPN is literally a 5 minute operation.

Hire a droplet VM, pre-installed with a server OS. Log in with provided credentials. sudo apt install docker Copy/paste a docker compose file that sets up a wg-easy container. Create a peer. Take a picture of the provided QR code. Connect to the server via a wireguard app. Done.

Are they going to ban VMs?

[–] deepus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Don't give them ideas!

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Docker's an unnecessary extra step. Just install wireguard server on the VM.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Myeah sort of agree if you compare wireguard vs wireguard docker.

But wg-easy has a management interface for creating peers and seeing who’s active so it’s somewhat easier to get set up.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

They could require age verification or even special licensing to use any sort of internet server infrastructure. That's what I would do if that was my goal.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Do the government ministers understand that setting up your own VPN is literally a 5 minute operation.

Of course they don't. Most of them type with their index fingers and don't even understand what a VPN is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

If someone tells them to, they might try until a few business interests remind them that these are also fundamental components of business networks. Once money tells them to stop it, they will.

VPN companies should just hire a lobbyist for a week and this will all go away.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Are they going to ban VMs?

They will keep banning things until they feel they have absolute control over the internet.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Stop fucking but make children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 250 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Stop ministers using VPNs to watch child porn.

Told!

[–] toad31@lemmy.cif.su 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah, never forget how the people in power routinely gave Epstein a pass because they were participating in raping kids.

All this "for the children" is performative bullshit to take more power away from the average person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 55 points 2 days ago (20 children)

If they were really after kids watching porn (or even porn in general) it would be technically somewhat simple to force ISPs to provide filters on their end as a subscription service. I'm pretty sure I've even heard that kind of services in the past. Make it even opt-out if you really want to.

That way ISPs would just ban everything from pornhub and others unless you spesifically want it allowed or even provide a portal where you could block reddit, twitter, tumblr or whatever you wish on your account. That kind of technology already exists and it's used on many corporate setups.

There's obviously ways around that, but there's no technical way to block every possible way to move bits between computers. Even if they would shut down the whole internet there's still ways to build mesh-networks or even buy USB-drives from a shady alley.

But as we all know, it's not about porn and not about children.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How much you wanna bet the ministers use VPN to watch porn as well?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 100 points 2 days ago

We didn’t see this one coming a mile away.

Palantir execs and shareholders are buzzing with anticipation.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 54 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Why are the kids technologically illiterate and undersexed until it comes to matters of government control? I'm not usually into tin foil hats, but this doesn't feel like the kids are the primary concern here.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But Dame Wontsomeonethinkof-de-Children saw a government report which says 65% of children under 5 have seen explicit videos of kittens being raped to death using power tools! Surely this constitutes an emergency which requires us to abandon online anonimity

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 77 points 2 days ago (7 children)

You ban something, and people will always find a way around it. Always.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 102 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Stop ministers making laws to... why the fuck they even do this bullshit? They are a government, they know everything about everyone even without such primitive control methods.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 88 points 2 days ago

The people pulling the strings have obviously decided that internet freedom is a threat to them and they're taking (global) action to ensure their supremacy.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›