this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2025
418 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

74484 readers
3140 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump tweet:

It is my Great Honor to report that the United States of America now fully owns and controls 10% of INTEL, a Great American Company that has an even more incredible future. I negotiated this Deal with Lip-Bu Tan, the Highly Respected Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The United States paid nothing for these Shares, and the Shares are now valued at approximately $11 Billion Dollars. This is a great Deal for America and, also, a great Deal for INTEL. Building leading edge Semiconductors and Chips, which is what INTEL does, is fundamental to the future of our Nation. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! Thank you for your attention to this matter.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Wonder what they're gonna use that power for, especially considering their efforts to censor history and go after people they don't like.

[–] byte_0verflow@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

Right when I was thinking of buying an intel cpu and gpu to support the company and do my little part in helping increase competition in the cpu and gpu sector. Guess I will stick with amd this time around.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The United States will not seek direct representation on Intel's board

If they want change, they don't to vote on the board. They can just pass laws in Intel's favour.

Taxpayers are now all Intel shareholders. I can't understand what benefit this provides them.

[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

Better than giving away billions of dollars no string attached

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

... Dick ...

[–] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Now do that with Exxon Mobil, Chevron and ConocoPhillips

[–] Therobohour@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Say goodbye to 10% of your tax dollars

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The United States paid nothing for these shares

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

buying stock with the people's money just in time for a recession

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As far as government bail outs go, I think taking a portion of the company in exchange is an excellent idea. THIS orange asshole is doing it for all the wrong reasons, and will VERY likely fuck up literally everything about it, but the idea is sound.

I wonder what things would look like today if the government had taken some portion of control over all the auto manufacturers, airlines, banks, etc it has bailed out over the years instead of just giving them unsecured loans

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago

I wonder what things would look like today if the government had taken some portion of control over all the auto manufacturers, airlines, banks, etc it has bailed out over the years instead of just giving them unsecured loans

Would look like normal capitalism of the early XIX century, give or take. Bad, but not atrocious. Bailouts definitely wouldn't be abused as much, because, eh, they wouldn't be free.

And the old argument that public sector management is inefficient - well, it's not always a bad thing. It would then make sense for the government to re-privatize some of those shares, and use others for a source of income and a lever. And the companies bailed out this way would sink in power (which is good for competition), but not completely (which is good for their employees and economical stability). And, of course, I'll repeat about source of income. Perhaps there will be no more raising taxes with such a system in place. Perhaps even some taxes it'll be possible to simplify - any complex tax system works in favor of those who can afford to apply expertise, so those richer, and not poorer.

Also partial or full nationalization may sometimes work to good outcomes, while nationalized companies are less efficient, they also tend to retain institutional knowledge better, have more people working long on the same positions, follow labor regulations. For the telephone company or the train company or the central heating company or the public bus company it makes sense to be nationalized.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (4 children)

you raise interesting questions. how do you stop some asshole president from using infinite taxpayer money to manipulate the price of a stock?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I don't know if you've noticed, but they already do that with zero government money.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How is it a great deal for Intel?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›