this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2025
102 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

75032 readers
2912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 6 points 54 minutes ago

Incite further right wing rage?

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 17 points 2 hours ago

Because censorship of topical newsworthy events is antithetical to freedom. Sure first the censorship will start with "gruesome" but it won't stop there, let people opt out, but it shouldn't be scrubbed from existence.

[–] waldo_was_here@piefed.social 55 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Charlie has so many videos saying "release the Epstein files" that I'm suprise Lefty's aren't capitalizing on them. Plus so many others where he says things that can be clipped. Like think of the collecting rrrreeeeeeeeeee from these fucks if Lefty's were posting pro gun clips of him under all their fake empathy posts

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 35 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

I hate when they delete stuff, like... do you want conspiracy theories to spread? Because that's how conspiracy theories spread.

[–] zrst@lemmy.cif.su 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's all about controlling how people see the world.

If we're only exposed to "disney, safe for china" media, then that's all people will think the world consists of.

They (people richer than us) don't want us seeing the reality of guns, only their carefully curated fantasies.

[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 13 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with this viscerally.

A lot of people are expressing sympathy for the people in the Kirk crowd, but honestly I think it might be a good thing for them — to see first hand what Kirk and the Republican rhetoric is actually advocating for. Maybe it'll snap them out of the fantasies they have of culling "undesirables".

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 hours ago

If they are mentally capable of making the connection between the things he advocated for, and those things happening directly to him.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

the problem is that due to the algorithmic nature of social media it ends up getting pushed to people who don't want to see it.

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Links? I missed the whole thing

[–] CrazyHorse@lemmy.cafe 14 points 3 hours ago (3 children)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 hour ago

I hadn't watched it till now.. yuck!

but probably something anyone that wants to talk about this should see

but it got me thinking, I think the shooter was aiming for his mouth and the drift made the shot hit a little lower

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 46 minutes ago

Directed by Quentin Tarantino

[–] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yeah, no desire to see it myself. I was on the fence about reporting a still shot I saw on IG. Don't suppress but don't advertise.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It’s very gruesome. I was not prepared.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Which is odd you know? I thought "meh I've seen some sick shit" but nope. One minute he's a racist accelerationist bigot and the next moment he still is but his brain is clearly whack and blood is rushing down his neck.

Movies and videogames don't come remotely close to representing it accurately

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve even see other videos of people getting killed before, and they were not this bad. Not often; I’m not someone who generally seeks that stuff out. Maybe it’s because of the bright lighting, high clarity, and comparatively high resolution of this one, combined with a gunshot wound that had very gory and visible results.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I think what gets people about this one is the large amount of blood that comes from severing a major artery like that and it funneling out through such a focused point followed by how quickly he reacts, goes into shock, then goes limp.

Most gore people get to see, even the real stuff, is much more initially destructive. So the blood goes everywhere all at once and there is very little time or ability to see the immediate reaction of the injured person.

For me, most of the worst stuff I've seen that is not tv/movie make believe that was the most unsettling had very little gore in the traditional sense. It was the reaction of the person that got injured that made it unsettling and the slow realization they make of what happened and is currently happening. There is a much more calm yet panicked tone to it than someone getting ran over by a tank or their head cut off by a terrorist.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's still up, in some places.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

I found it on wikipedia of all places