this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
86 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3209 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Florida Senate takes up bill banning kids from having social media accounts::Critics have said the bills are unconstitutional and violate First Amendment protections.

all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nix@merv.news 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How do y’all who say this is good not realize this is a way to get everyone to have to submit their ID to prove their age and so you can be tracked even more intensely

[–] nodsocket@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Yes, that is the only way to enforce this.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Locking everything behind barbed wire is surely the solution. It has worked so well before.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Every now and then, Florida does something I agree with. It's always a surprise. Maybe also ban parents from making social media channels that exploit their children.

[–] iterable@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Everyone will need a ID for online access... boooo....but for the kids...yeahhhhhh...will make the companies pay for it....fuck no all ISPs leave Florida and social sites block Florida. Florida is thrown back to dial up connections. Techs I know in Florida have gotten warnings if the law passes their company is leaving the state.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They’ll just pass another law saying that ISPs can’t leave. Problem solved! ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[–] iterable@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It wont be a law cause they know it would fail in courts. They would do the same as with insurance companies leaving. We will start a investigation into this...and never hear about it again.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Whatever do you mean? Certainly they made those mean ol’ insurance companies stay, didn’t they?!?

(Just so no one misunderstands - /s)

[–] theluddite@lemmy.ml 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe this is a hot take, but it's really unfortunate that only the unhinged conservative lunatics are willing to have this discussion. I actually think that it'd be really healthy in a democracy to come together and exercise some agency in how we allow tech companies to access our children, if at all, but American liberals seem committed to some very broken notions of technocratic progress paired with free speech, while American conservatives are happy to throw all that away in order to have total control over their children, arriving closer to the right place for very dangerous reasons.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 months ago

Maybe this is a hot take, but it's really unfortunate that only the unhinged conservative lunatics are willing to have this discussion.

It's because the US has no left wing. There are the Democrats, who are more than happy to see big corpos getting rich by exploiting people. And there are the Republicans, who basically believe the same thing, but with an extra helping of being super reactionary to any kind of societal change. Neither party would approach this question from the perspective of "what does the science say about this topic?"

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

How will Matt Gaetz find his next partner though?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

There's no good links from the article about the actual wording of the bill, but you all realize this would probably affect Lemmy and Mastodon too, right?

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

That would very much depend on the specific implementation details. If it's done in the same vein as pornographic content it would be as simple as adding a "If you live in Florida you must be over 18 to create an account. Click here to certify you don't live in Florida or are over 18." disclaimer to the account creation page. If it tries to add some kind of identity verification service that requires companies to use, then that's a whole other problem and would effectively make it DOA.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 8 points 9 months ago

If a server and it's staff aren't located in Florida, do they actually have much enforcement ability?

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As I get older, I've realized that places like here and reddit would be wildly better if everyone younger than me wasn't allowed to use it, lol. :P

[–] kometes@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Everyone is younger than me...

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I've never used 4chan but I have the impression you don't need an account to post there. Does that make it bypass this law?

Obligatory: https://xkcd.com/591/

[–] Wilshire@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

How to get social media blocked in your state.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

As far as I'm aware, it was already illegal for under 13s, no? Just not enforced in the slightest unfortunately.