this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
570 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

76171 readers
2657 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

Not surprising, the card was filled with... UNCOMPRESSIBLE DATA!

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

What do you mean "tragic"?

[–] KneeTitts@lemmy.world 3 points 14 minutes ago

Define "tragic"

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 26 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They should have built the hull out of SanDisk cards.

[–] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 hour ago

I'd go for a mix of 50% sd cards and 50% controllers. Maybe 40/60, science is not decided yet.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Spoiler: Nothing about the big boom or that trip was on it (as designed, lol), but it's cool that it survived.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

That even a depth rated camera is broken can easily explained with the point that the implosion produced shock waves with pressure spikes easily exceeding the official ratings of the camera.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 28 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Damn, that’s promotional material that SanDisk would probably not want to have.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago (1 children)

Nah, more like great promo material for the camera that survived the whole mess mostly intact.

Too bad they dropped the ball by not having the decryption keys for the actual video on the card.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 minutes ago

New form of key compression unlocked!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Why? It wasn't there submersible, their product wasn't responsible for its destruction and frankly there is very little in the way of public sympathy.

The product is not even rated as waterproof and yet it's survived months at the bottom of the ocean after having survived a destructive implosion.

That's hella marketing.

[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The marketing is more for the submersible camera that survived, just like it was designed to do, the SD card was just inside the camera and no water even touched it. I don't think the SD card should be getting any credit.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I know but marketing is marketing. It doesn't really have to make any sense.

If the Xbox controller had survived I'm sure Microsoft would have made big of that even though it's basically irrelevant to the product.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They didn't even use an Xbox controller, they cheaped out and used an ancient Logitech clone

[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 9 points 9 hours ago

Why not? If anything, it shows how durable their product is. If it were my company, I would market the shit out of this.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 7 hours ago

sd is so sturdy it can withstand pressures of depts at 12000ft.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (5 children)

Tragic?

Try "predictable"

Please watch the Netflix documentary if you havent.

The sub was never meant for that depth and they knew it.

They could literally hear the carbon fibers snapping every dive.

They had to retire an entire chassis because it failed at similar depths.

Nahh, the tragedy is rich people think they are better than physics itself.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 hour ago

I think it’s more like what are the chances it fails while we’re in it? Fuck it.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The main issue with the Titan wasn't as much the depth as it was cyclic loading

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

No, it was entirely the depth. They tested it in the lab and saw many failures but never changed the design.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The tragedy is that more of these rich people don't test that belief against reality.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 5 hours ago

At least two billionaires keep firing rockets into space as a hobby. It's only a matter of time.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Trying to do extreme engineering on the cheap.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

it was DIY from start o finish on the craft. as opposed to spending 5-10mil on a spherical TITATANIUM sub. instead he used carbon fiber which was defective airplane parts.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago

How many atmospheres can this ship withstand?

Well it's a ~~spaceship~~ airplane, so I'd say anywhere between zero and one."

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This was a reverse tragedy.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 11 hours ago

There was a tragedy. One billionaire forcing their child to die

load more comments
view more: next ›