this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
236 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

76339 readers
4155 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pechente@feddit.org 118 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Meta is also planning to drop its native WhatsApp Windows app in favor of a web wrapper version soon, in what looks like a move to simplify WhatsApp development.

So they are just going back to what they had before, probably to save money.

But don’t they have AI now which makes development so much faster, easier and cheaper? It’s these things where you can see these companies are full of bullshit.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What? It feels like a web wrapper right now, I always thought it was an old backend because the web app had better functionality.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

IIRC the WhatsApp app is a native Windows app using C++ and XAML, while the Messenger app is a React Native app.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Tangentially related but I have to harp on about it because almost nobody is saying it. Microsoft —and specifically xbox — Had it’s most profitable yearS ever and people (journalists) still try to rationalize every time they raise prices and lay off thousands and thousands of workers

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The AI stuff might genuinely factor into it, I largely don’t use it myself but from what I understand from some colleagues it’s churning out decent react and co, while other languages can have mixed results.

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago

That’s quite an interesting take. I also noticed that it’s magnitudes better at coding with common frameworks and often sucks with more niche applications.

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 50 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Have to boost those Facebook page visit numbers!

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

yup. i have a bunch of users that won't be happy. they only still have fb for messenger, use the messenger app, and never go to fb itself anymore.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You can still use the web version.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that mean visiting Facebook?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

messenger.com

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

for thier fake AI users to train.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Desktop site is the only place I access messages. Get fucked Zuck I'm not putting your spyware on my phone. If that method ever goes away, I guess no more messages for me..

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I just flat out quit messenger when they made it app-only. I'm not installing that shit in my phone or my computer. Facebook on my phone is just the web app.

Best part is no little red digits telling me I'm missing out on something (spam and shit I don't care about 95% of the time). I check it when I think to. That's once every few months which is about how often I'm interested in updates from people who aren't in my life any more.

I'd like to replace all of my apps with bookmarks eventually. No one needs that kind of data on me.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I just flat out quit messenger when they made it app-only.

but they didn't.

or you mean on the phone? switch on desktop site mode in firefox and done. but it's harder to use on phone sized screens

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I did that for like a year, but eventually I lost my ability to use it even through a browser. Not sure why your experience was different. Maybe Android vs. iOS? Anyway, I've been off it so long now it doesn't matter. No one uses it to reach me.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 4 days ago

You can still use the website. This is just talking about the native apps.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Considering the unrelenting data snatching capacity of the desktop app, there are only 3 plausible reasons Facebook, a company so maliciously money hungry that it might just prove the absence of god, would choose to deprecate it

1: something is fundamentally wrong with the app and they feel they are liable for greater damages than their potential profits

2: they’ve improved their data collection on browsers to the point that both methods are equally profitable

3: they don’t believe they need the money. (This one sincerely terrified me)

[–] tyler@programming.dev 34 points 4 days ago (3 children)
  1. They’re losing money on those teams and simplifying their stack will allow them to reduce costs.
[–] EmilyIsTrans@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 days ago

Yeah, someone has looked at the spreadsheet and realised that basically no one uses the desktop app I'll bet

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)
  1. They know people use the desktop app in order to not use the phone app, and they want those people on the phone instead because the phone is even more data-valuable and ad-valuable

Facebook web on mobile browser already doesn't allow messenger, and tells you to get the app. Pulling messenger from the desktop web browser will be the next move, forcing people to app completely.

Glad I don't use it.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago

And that's when I'm installing Prosody on my VDS and telling family to use Conversations.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 6 points 4 days ago

and 5. They know that they're not going to lose any meaningful number of users by getting rid of these apps that just cost them money needlessly

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't have any knowledge about this in particular, but as someone with experience working at big tech companies, you're missing the most likely reason:

  1. Everyone who worked on it was reorged to higher priority teams, and nobody is left to maintain the apps

A lot of teams are only 3-6 developers, an engineering manager, a project manager, and a designer. Other roles like content design and QA are often shared across lots of teams. Developers with experience building native apps might be needed on other projects.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 12 points 3 days ago

let me guess ... you will now have to ask an ai agent to communicate to your contacts for you

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Honest question: who even uses this bullshit?

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mostly, people with friends.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Phew, dodged that bullet 😎

[–] abfarid@startrek.website 5 points 4 days ago

I always do that Neo dodge, but we all know how that ended.

[–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

WhatsApp and Messenger are the #1 and #3 most used messaging apps in the world. (#2 is WeChat)

In Australia where I'm from, Messenger is the most popular by far.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

All my mates still sms which feel like one step from the bush telephone these days.

[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago

Students, especially in the Philippines and some 3rd world countries. You can basically use Messenger and Facebook without data, just without images or video. For the sake of accessibility schools tend to use these services.

[–] Dagamant@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Messages is the only place they don’t spam ads at you. I use the messenger app for work because they think Facebook is the best way to do business communications. Maybe I’ll be able to convince them to switch to something else.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] Dagamant@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago
[–] majster@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago

All my friends are on Messenger. It's garbage app. More garbage is only Viber where I have my relatives. Pure suffering.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Based on how often it happens, "curse and find whatever f'n tab is now making the noise" is my favourite game.

Fuck this "web as app" shit.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I'm confused. Are you upset the app is being removed? As in you don't like webapps, you want them as apps?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Finally! Meta does something for the good of humanity!

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I avoid those desktop apps, anyway. I just keep them in browser tabs. Not that I frequent Facebook.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

i only ever use facebook not logged into to download maps for a old game, and i use ublock origin to remove the annoying login screen.

[–] Ashtear@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ugh, the only thing I hate more than a few people I regularly talk with still using Messenger is having to deal with the desktop client. Now this 🙄

I moved to a web browser but I can't even get push notifications working.

[–] dan@upvote.au 1 points 4 days ago

I can't even get push notifications working.

Which browser? Safari is notorious for having a lot of bugs around push notifications, but Chrome and Firefox should both work.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

ive been using beeper so its a matter if they kill the API in my case. (im surprised they didn't nuke the API first)

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I always mourn the loss of native apps. There are always so many downsides. And they harm platform consistency, etc.

Don’t get me started on Discord not supporting the native spell check. The built in spell check is terrible.

[–] dan@upvote.au 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And they harm platform consistency, etc.

Unfortunately, a lot of major apps aren't consistent any more. Each app uses its own design language and its own UI widgets, rather than using proper native ones. Often they're no better than web apps. I hate it and would rather just use a web app instead.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago
[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

Somehow they believe this will increase their user base...

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

They're trying to become the WeChat of the west lolol

load more comments
view more: next ›